Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Now That Preseason Has Concluded, What Is Your Depth Chart at RB, WR, and TE On The Current Roster?


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

Obviously, we can't foresee who we may bring in, as it is rumored that Gettleman is still looking for help and I'm sure plenty more options will become available following final cuts.  So, who of the current crop makes it, and at WR, who is the guy that gets the axe if we bring in someone else?  I chose these three positions because offense is obviously our weaker facet and these positions seem to be the most important, plus, I think the 53-projection threads get convoluted.  NOTE:  This is who YOU would keep, not who you think the staff will...  But, feel free to include both if you want, as it makes for good discussion.

RB: Stew, CAP, Todman, Wegher

*I like Fozzy, but I think Todman makes him replaceable and they're too similar to keep both.  Todman offers the same versatility as Fozzy with ST play, and he is faster and quicker as well, which is what Fozzy's strength was out of this group.  I'm don't think Rivera would keep Wegher over Fozzy, but this is MY thread.

 

WRs: Funch, Ginn, Bersin, Norwood, (reluctantly) Philly Brown

 

*We need help, and honestly, after the preseason he had, Philly should be the last WR on the depth chart if he is on the final roster...  But, knowing Rivera, that's not happening.  He wants Philly to succeed, and he will give him every opportunity.  Regardless of whatever happens with the guys on the current roster, we have to add another guy IMO, and my preference would be to upgrade Bersin and Brown.  Bersin is fairly reliable on offense, but he isn't going to make many big plays for you once the ball is in his hands.  I'd have no problem if we signed two potential upgrades, cut Philly, and Bersin remains as the last WR, because he has earned that.  But, I doubt that happens.  I think we keep the guys I listed and then add another WR with no plans of playing him over Bersin or Brown.  *EDIT* Like an idiot, I did it on the fly while watching and listening to the post game presser following the game and completely left out Ginn and Cotch.  Ginn may have been subconscious, because as I've said numerous times, I view him more as a returner than a receiver, but with our lack of talent at the position, he is my #2.  Cotch would be cut in my universe, but I fully expect Cotch to be a starter come Jacksonville.

 

TEs: Olsen, obvs., Williams, Dickson, LUCAS

*I don't see the staff thinking like this, but I think over the last two PS, Lucas has shown enough to merit a roster spot - IF WE'RE COMMITTED TO OUR CURRENT ROSTER PLAYERS.  I don't necessarily think Lucas has a position, as his blocking still has a ways to go, but he can definitely get open and make plays in the passing game.  I would keep him as a sort of flex/hybrid guy...  He's listed as a TE, but he is more a WR because of his weakness as an in-line blocker.  He essentially is the 6th WR until we find something better.  And honestly, Philly would still be the first guy I cut in favor of a new signee.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can someone explain to me why Todman is the trendy pick over Fozzy? 

Fozzy is excellent in blitz pick-up and has already proven to be a nice change-of-pace back in our system. I guess Todman is the new shiny toy.  

Todman is Fozzy plus long speed. I'm a Fozzy fan, but he and Todman are too similar and Todman wins out in ability and potential. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RB: Stew, CAP, Todman, Fozzy

Stew and CAP are both locks. Todman's performance plus his ST ability makes him a near-lock IMO. I would like to see us go with Wegher over Fozzy, but I highly doubt they take an unknown in Wegher over a known commodity in the Foz. 

 

WR: Cotchery, Ginn, Funchess, Philly Brown, Bersin, Norwood

Cotchery, Ginn, Funchess are all locks. Brown is almost assuredly a lock despite his struggles this preseason; should he struggle in the early season, perhaps they would look elsewhere for WR talent. Bersin has played solidly all preseason and has strong chemistry with Cam, and despite the near-irrational hate for him on the huddle, I can't see them letting him go. Norwood will most likely make the team over other unproven players like Byrd and Mike Brown. Personally, I think they keep these 6, and I am fine with that.

 

TE: Olsen (duh), Dickson, Lucas

Olsen is a lock. Dickson is a lock with his new contract and his skill as a blocker and receiver. I really like what I have seen from Lucas, and I think they keep him around as a TE/WR. Williams has not been on the field enough to warrant a roster spot (though I would like to see him put it together in a year or two). Simonson is sure-handed, but lacks in blocking ability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I *think* will ultimately happen:

RB: Stew, CAP, Todman, Fozzy

WR: Funchess, Cotchery, Ginn, Brown, Norwood, Bersin

TE: Olsen, Dickson, Williams

 

I'd prefer Wegher to Fozzy, but given our WR woes, I believe Rivera will keep a known quantity in Fozzy to Wegher because he will need to lean on his backs for production in both the run and pass game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...