Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Final Panthers Cuts


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 safeties seems kind of unlikely if you look at the numbers game... Could Roman be on the bubble?

I've never seen anyone speculate about 5 safeties except when Colin Jones injury was feared serious.  I think Ron's made it clear Marlowe is headed to PS.  We've got Coleman, Boston, Harper & Colin Jones.  I'm guessing Marlowe to PS.  Lester and Ball already cut, if I remember correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never seen anyone speculate about 5 safeties except when Colin Jones injury was feared serious.  I think Ron's made it clear Marlowe is headed to PS.  We've got Coleman, Boston, Harper & Colin Jones.  I'm guessing Marlowe to PS.  Lester and Ball already cut, if I remember correctly.

I'm seeing Marlowe has made the roster.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOTS of discussion on Twitter about the Fozzy vs. Todman debate

https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&vertical=default&q=Todman&src=typd

 

Here is my conspiracy theory--we have 3 RBs and Tolbert.  While I expect Fozzy or Todman to make the team, If we have other needs for depth (say DT since our starters will be out of shape; DE, and DB) the smart thing would be to cut them both and carry a RB on the PS.  Wegher just played too well to be that PS back, so they may cut them both and find a fourth back after cuts to put on the PS.  Just a theory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never seen anyone speculate about 5 safeties except when Colin Jones injury was feared serious.  I think Ron's made it clear Marlowe is headed to PS.  We've got Coleman, Boston, Harper & Colin Jones.  I'm guessing Marlowe to PS.  Lester and Ball already cut, if I remember correctly.

Marlowe told his family he made the team which I'll go off of till something else comes out about him. Today and next Sunday completely different story, pulling for him though. He's got major upside.

Edited by carpanfan96
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at our Safeties and tell me you feel good with 4--one is an in-the-box linebacker type, but he was not impressive in preseason.  He whiffed and committed penalties.  The other is a special teamer never intended to be more than that--but maybe OK depth as the 4th S. 

Marlowe is multi-dimensional and I don't think he would survive the PS.  We would be up the creek without a paddle going with Boston, Coleman, and the 2 mentioned above.

I will go out on a limb and suggest that we either keep 5 Safeties or we cut Harper.  To Harper's credit, he is the vocal leader of the secondary, but our defense is not as effective with one coach and 10 players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not yet, I don't think, especially if Colin Jones might not be 100% yet.

But with Marlowe on the PS, I think Harper could be worked out of a job even before the season ends.

Unconfirmed, but Marlowe on the roster (if true) certainly suggests things could get interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Then Dan Morgan should be on the hot seat. Wasting a first and second rounder in a pivotal year is unforgivable.
    • They addressed D in free agency in a big way (Edge, ILB) and they signed a starting OT and a player they think could be a swing OT in reserve.  They have claimed to be adding "Weapons" to the offense.  I think that will be their focus.  I agree 100% that we need a T, but a reserve, developmental OT in a weak (at the top) draft does little to address that weakness in 2026.  If they are telling the truth, a reserve developmental OT is not a weapon.  The will draft a WR if that statement and their actions in free agency are accurate.  That does not mean we ignore OT--I just dont see where he takes a T if he is filling holes. As a coach, I am concerned about OT, but when I look at the roster, I see bigger immediate problems. S: We are OK if you want Scott for another season. Not ideal.  There is also talk of Smith-Wade being moved to S.  If so, we need a CBN. DT: Who took Robinson's job?  He played a lot.  All DTs (NT-DE) were average to below average, (except Derrick Brown) including 280 lb wharton.  We need a DT (my preference for the first pick, to be honest)  I am guessing a DT will be our third rounder? ILB:  Unless we want Wallace out there in coverage, we need a compliment to Lloyd.  I think Lloyd's starting mate is the second rounder. (speculating)  This pick is likely to occur in the second round because it is for a starting position. WR:  Some are fine with what we have.  sIn 2025, Coker had 3  TDs on 394 yards.  Legette had 3 TDs and 363 yards--and only 1 drop.  I love Coker, but neither should make us feel secure about WR with those numbers.  A lot depends on both stepping up in 2026, but Canales has been screaming weapons.  Could he mean Tight end?  That depends on how good they feel about Coker and XL. Center:  You can get a player ready to start relatively early in the middle rounds.  Very similar to the OT situation but I think C may be more of a priority right now than OT.   Tight End:  They seem to like Delp from Georgia who projects round 4. CB:  There was some talk of moving Smith-Wade to S (to learn for a season with Scott, maybe?) and that might require adding CB depth inside. Tackle?:  I agree that we need one, but this draft is simply not strong at the top at T.  The ONLY way to get a quality OT that is still developmental is to take one in round 1.  Canales has all but said we are not doing that.  But after the first 40 picks or so, they pretty much level out for a good while.  The fifth rounders and the third rounders are about the same.  For that Reason, I am guessing (It is all guesses) that they take someone like the OT from Boston College or Memphis.  Work with the OL coach (OT specialist) for a season.  I dunno
×
×
  • Create New...