Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina can't buy a win after bye week


X-Clown on 1

Recommended Posts

This is has been on my mind ever since I knew we were playing Seattle, in Seattle, immediately after our bye week.  Since 2011, under Rivera, we are 0-4 coming off of our bye weeks.  Seattle is vulnerable this year, but as of recent, we always seem to come out flat after our bye weeks.  I've referenced a Nov 2014 article that breaks it down a little more in detail.  However, I will say I liked that Rivera had these guys show up for film today, instead of giving them Victory Monday off.  Let's hope they stay hungry.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/article9238565.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been hearing this bye week thing mentioned a lot lately.  At first I was thinking that it was more coincidence than substance.  After looking at the actual game scores though, it looks like there is something to this:

2011:  Titans 30 Panthers 3

2012: Cowboys 19 Panthers 14

2013: Panthers 6 Cardinals 22

2014: Panthers 13 Vikings 31

Three out of four of these were not even close.  Hopefully Ron makes some good changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been hearing this bye week thing mentioned a lot lately.  At first I was thinking that it was more coincidence than substance.  After looking at the actual game scores though, it looks like there is something to this:

2011:  Titans 30 Panthers 3

2012: Cowboys 19 Panthers 14

2013: Panthers 6 Cardinals 22

2014: Panthers 13 Vikings 31

Three out of four of these were not even close.  Hopefully Ron makes some good changes.

Youre missing a game... Playoffs, 2013.... We had a bye being the 2nd seed at 12-4.... Couldnt beat the zebras & the 49ers.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I decided to look a little more closely at our record following bye weeks.

First it's worth noting that under Rivera & Cam, we've never taken a winning record into a bye week.  (I'm disregarding the Jan 2014 playoff loss / bye as I think the playoff loss is a different category).

  • In 2011 prior to the week 9 bye, we were 2-6, with a 1 game losing streak coming into the bye.  Tennessee was 4 - 4 when we played them.
  • In 2012 prior to the week 6 bye, we were 1 - 4  with a 3 game losing streak.   Dallas was 2 - 3 when we played them.
  • In 2013, we were 1-2 prior to our week 4 bye, coming off a 1 game winning streak (the 38-0 blow out of the Giants).  AZ was 2 - 2 when we played them.
  • In 2014, we were 3 - 7 - 1 prior to our week 12 bye, coming off a 5 game losing streak.   Minnesota was 4 - 7 when we played them.

So, not only did we have a losing record in each case, we also played teams that had better records than we did at the time.

So... this year we're 4 - 0 and we will have a better record than Seattle when we play them, so, I'm really hoping we can break this "the team can't win after a bye" stereotype altogether.  This year is a totally different situation.

We're building a winning culture.  We've started fast.  We've got an 8 game regular season win streak going.  We've held tough to win close games we often would have lost in the past.   No need to keep hanging this expectation of losing following the bye on the team.

Let's expect the win, and let's hope Ron and the team don't start to believe this we can't win after the bye nonsense.  I'm glad they're not being complacent about it, but, it's really not the same situation this year at all.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...