Trade for Sammy Watkins?

[Hammerin'Cameron34]

We already have a #1 recriver.

And you seriously believe Buffalo would give up a guy they drafted fourth overall for a second round pick? 

Fah Sho, used goods, used is used. Did you think we could get Olsen for a 3rd

[Toolbox]

If the bills wasted marshawn lynch's talent you can be damn sure they will do the same to watkins..

[Mr. Scot]

Fah Sho, used goods, used is used. Did you think we could get Olsen for a 3rd

Second year isn't "used goods".

Olsen was in his fourth year and didn't fit Mike Martz's system. He also wasn't a top five pick that his team traded up to get. 

The notion that the Bills would agree to trade Watkins away easily is just stupid. 

[Match.com]

We already have a #1 and a high round pick who still has plenty of potential to be a quality guy. 

Trading what it would take to get a guy like Watkins means giving up on Funchess only four games in.

Throw in that Ginn is off to the best start of his career. 

Don't think either of those players you name can bring more to the table than Sammy Watkins but really this would never happen. Panther Fan since the start and haven't felt any excitement about having a receiving combo on our team since smitty and Moose...and that's ancient history. We haven't been ranked in the top 10 in offense since chud got bait in switched. I'm getting older every season and I just want to win...Like Now!!!!

[panthers55]

Heck no I wouldn't give up a bunch for Watkins or most anyone else. We need our future number 1 for a left tackle or DE. When KB comes back and as Funchess improves and Ginn gets even better, we won't be needing Watkins or anyone else. He is not the one player we need for a Superbowl run so why mortgage your future for some improvement now when you have your 1, 2,and 3 receivers already.

[pantherclaw]

Hell No.

[mc52beast]

He's under the height requirement per Dave Gettleman

[Beast Mode]

Kind of hope Seattle trades for him so we can leave him in to block on passing downs and never throw to him. 

[B.BERSIN]

Sammy, don't mess up with your FO and coaches, or you will be traded for a 7th round pick of the Panthers.

JK.

[Ken]

Would love to happen but ot doesn't make sense.

 

We will have to pay both him and KB at the same time. Juat to get Watkins, we are going to have to give up a lot,  so we pay him. Then what about KB, our 1st rounder? Surely we won't let him walk? However it is not feasible to pay both unless you want to destroy your cap.

So while its all nice to picture KB and Watkins on the same team it doesn't make a any sense, in terms of how much we'll need to give up for him or down the road when both him and KB will need to be paid.

[thefuzz]

Cam needs weapons.

Cam needs someone to throw the ball to.

Cam, Cam, Cam, Cam.....is 4-0 so far this season, and I hope to god we aren't trading 1st's for anyone other than Rodgers.

[Davidson Deac II]

I would trade a first for Watkins in a heartbeat and I think Gettleman would as well.  Not only is he a proven performer, even with the crappy qb's that Buffalo has, he would come relatively cheap in that he is still on his rookie contract, (four million or so a year). If you pick someone in the first, you never know for certain if they can perform at the NFL level until they prove it on the field.  Watkins has proven it.  He would definitely be worth a first. 

 

As far as him wanting the ball, that is most receivers in the NFL.   His only mistake was saying it in public. 

 

But if anyone thinks we would get him for just a first, well I have a bridge I would like to sell you. 

[h0llywood]

While our cap space is much better than it was before, we are still window shopping at Tiffany's and won't step foot inside that store.

[2plankingpanther]

I agree but just for fun: J-No for him straight up?

NO!!!No pie for you Mister!