Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Piercing ears for baby girl

Ja Rhule

By Ja Rhule,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

captfluoro Apprentice

captfluoro

Posted
Posted

I wanted my daughter to wait until she was 12 years old but I gave in to her and my wife and let her get it done at 10.  She had it done at Claire's for her birthday party. About three other girls got it done at the same time.  I never understood the  pierced ears on a baby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PhillyB Grand Master

PhillyB

Posted
Posted

How dare you force "feminine" ideals on a young girl.

that's not what it's about at all, it's opposition to forcing a bodily deformation (and the pain that comes with it) on a baby or a small child for what ultimately amounts to your own desire to accessorize your children. no baby gives a damn about an earring, it's about parents willing to put that child through the pain so everyone will ooh and ahh. terrible practice imo

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zaximus Veteran

Zaximus

Posted
Posted

So boys should not be circumcised until they 10 or older according to huddle?

Probably shouldn't be at all, considering there really isn't hard proof that there are benefits or that it needs to be done.

 

Regards to the child getting ears pierced, I would assume they should at LEAST be at an age where they can decide if they want it or not......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • kungfoodude
      Teddy Checkdown in trouble

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • tukafan21
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...