Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The tables have turned in the Cam vs Luck debate


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I remember around this time last year when Cam Newton vs. Andrew Luck posts would pop up. I say "posts" because threads about Cam would somehow morph into Luck > Cam debates (and sometimes even Russel Wilson and Ryan Tannehill would be thrown into the mix). No matter how much Cam supporters would talk about the need for perspective, the Luck-e-fanboys would always come and dismiss such arguments as "homerism" or the grasping of straws by Cam apologists. 

Amid arguments about O-line protection (then and now), Cam's relative lack of experience in regards to his collegiate and pro careers, the fact that his career passer rating was roughly the same as Luck's, and the fact that it's kind of difficult to judge the importance of Cam's running prowess, the main point of contention was that Cam didn't have the offensive weapons.  Well, Cam still doesn't have the class of weapons that Luck has, but it certainly hasn't mattered this season. Cam is showing his mettle, and Luck...well, he's wilting. Isn't it ironic that in a year that many football fans and pundits thought that Cam would be mired in the quicksand of mediocrity and Luck would further his push towards football immortality, that Cam is steadily cracking that glass ceiling that the ignorant thought would hold him down while Luck seems lost within the clouds?

Now, the story is still being written for Cam, Luck and all of the young field generals of the day. And I am not saying that Luck will never be great, or that Cam is a football god. But, what I am saying is that Luck was never the cut-and-dried superior QB that his fans---some now, apologists---tried to make him out to be. Cam is squarely in Luck's league...literally and figuratively. Cam has always arguably done more with less, and his success on the field this year in light of that fact is sweet vindication for his most stalwart supporters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So no one is worried about Cam's performance since the bye?  2 TDs and 5 INTs won't win a super bowl, and in all honesty it won't even get us there.

He can be better and needs to be better.

Wins are fantastic but like we've said so many times with Luck they surrounded him with offensive talent and the Panthers surrounded Cam with a running game and a great defense.  Reminds me more of Russell Wilson and how they went through those winning seasons.  Ultimately though the QB has to make good throws.  Cam has a few throws that simply can't be done by many other guys in the league, however, he also makes some throws that puts the defense in bad situations.  Luck's defense would give up touchdowns in those situations, the Panthers hold defenses to field goals or stop them in their tracks.  That's the biggest difference right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So no one is worried about Cam's performance since the bye?  2 TDs and 5 INTs won't win a super bowl, and in all honesty it won't even get us there.

He can be better and needs to be better.

Wins are fantastic but like we've said so many times with Luck they surrounded him with offensive talent and the Panthers surrounded Cam with a running game and a great defense.  Reminds me more of Russell Wilson and how they went through those winning seasons.  Ultimately though the QB has to make good throws.  Cam has a few throws that simply can't be done by many other guys in the league, however, he also makes some throws that puts the defense in bad situations.  Luck's defense would give up touchdowns in those situations, the Panthers hold defenses to field goals or stop them in their tracks.  That's the biggest difference right now.

Cam is performing fine. Like 2 out of 5 ints were actual bad throws instead of bounced off open receiver's palms into a db's hands. Or just wrestled out on the ground weirdly,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why don't we just say they can shove the late round draft picks up their ass? If they want a player they will be starting at WR in Week 1, I want a MLB in return that we can start Week 1. Starter for a Starter Not Starter for a draft pick we'll be debating whether or not they should make the final 53 man roster in 2026.
    • Why?   No. This isn't a situation of a player we want to trade because we have no use for them.  He's our starting slot WR, our leader of the young WR room, Bryce's safety option the last 2 years who he has good chemistry with. If the Vikings didn't run into WR trouble, we'd never have been even considering trading him, so why in the world should we give him up for fair market value in a vacuum for Thielen and disregard what losing him off our roster will do for us this year? A 5th round pick in 2026 is a negligible draft pick, especially with this season being so make or break for Bryce and Canales.
    • The Vikings acquiring all these late round picks has me feeling like we're about to see another CMC situation play out here. Trade a player we really like for the equivalent of what we want for them on the draft pick chart, but because of a bunch of late round picks instead of the one pick value we actually want. Which will do the same thing in the end, nothing, because 6th and 7th round picks rarely work out to begin with, or we're just going to use them to move up 10 picks in the 3rd or 4th round to take another DJ Johnson
×
×
  • Create New...