Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Last night's game


Packersfan

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Packersfan said:

Happy you guys won with how awful the officiating was. I thought you let off the gas alot but you still won and that's all that matters. The hold on Olsen that negated a 1st down was BS. I like Cam, guy is a beast. We will have our hands full Sunday.

Make sure to tell Aaron to play like he did last week ok please thank you 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you're wayyyy too positive on here. To get the full Huddle experience you need to complain regardless of how good our record is.

I mean, just look at those wide receivers! terrible.

and look at that playcalling! terrible.

and look at those two morons hanging from the upper deck!

everything sucks. even though we're 7-0 and outperforming EVERYONE'S expectations for this year.

we are definitely a glass half empty kind of fanbase. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Packersfan said:

You guys like your rookie Funchess? Is he a deep threat?

Funchess is a project, for every nice catch he's had a nicer drop or worse.  Ginn and Brown are our deep threats and drop at a slightly lower rate than Funchess. So really our deep threat is Olsen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Packersfan said:

You guys like your rookie Funchess? Is he a deep threat?

I like his potential long term but I don't like it when he's on the field this year. Seems like nothing good ever happens. Had some big catches late against Seattle (after causing an interception earlier...) but for the most part has just hurt us. Not a deep threat. Really our only deep threat is Ginn and as I'm sure you saw in OT last night, he's not reliable. People peg Philly Brown as a deep threat but he's not really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Packersfan said:

You guys like your rookie Funchess? Is he a deep threat?

more a possession guy that sees very few reps.  young.  he will get some light work though. 

Ginn and Brown are the deep threats.  Now, catching?  Work in progress on those routes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CRA said:

Hope he does the same for you this week

Meanwhile, Eddie Lacy was my #1 pick in my money league.  Yeah, that has worked out well for me.

And a packers W lol. I was up 106-98 going into last night's game. I had Olsen and he had Luck. I got 13 from Olsen to hold him off 119-114. Thank god for Luck's 2 interceptions which gave him -4 points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ideally Bryce and the other starters should get at least a full quarter and an argument could be made for 2 full quarters given how they've played early in the season the last few years.
    • A rookie that has never played a snap and a proven 1000K NFL WR are not going to be viewed the same in these type rankings.  And calling draft picks, lotto picks, isn't some new quip I just invented.  take the big 3 Hubbard, AT, insert whatever 3rd Panther you want vs Kamara, Hill, Olave.  Most football folks outside of Carolina are picking the Saints there IMO.    
    • You didn’t really address the point, just like you ignored the point about the RBs initially, and saying “they are all lotto picks” is just a really silly reduction because you could say that about literally any player rookie or vet every snap, every game, every year. It is well known that different positions have different hit rates, and I would argue different types of prospects within position groups as well, and that hit rates change the further down in the draft you go. Everybody knows QB is different and that, for example, first round OL have a really high success rate. Using your lotto ticket analogy…again…you are saying a lotto ticket with a 1 in 100 chance of hitting is the exact same thing as a lotto ticket with a 1 in 2 chance of hitting (this is an example, don’t take these odds literally). The point was he is no more of a lotto ticket than the 31yr old receiver coming off a major knee injury, and in my opinion he is better odds with a higher potential “jackpot”. Saying one player is an “lotto ticket” while another isn’t is just not sound logic. You have no idea who will break out, regress, get injured, etc. There are safer bets than others, that’s all. I don’t think Diggs is a safe bet and even if he was, weighing him over all of the Panthers WRs plus 2 1k rushers is just dumb. You can disagree if you want. The list is stupid.
×
×
  • Create New...