Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Photo of the Greg Olsen "hold"


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Just realized I had a good frame of this... panthers-colts-1.thumb.jpg.4079a1383abe4

 

May have been a hold. But if it was, it was probably the least ticky tack holds of the night that went called or uncalled. 

Interesting time to throw the flag. Game would have been over without it. Hard to believe that did not play a factor in the refs decision. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, I wouldn't have cared if the Colts were getting flags for TACKLING OUR D-LINEMAN TO THE GROUND all game.  Short was held literally, all game, no joke.  I mean, I seen jersey in hands that second half with no calls.

Also, are people finally starting to come around to the fact the refs are pushing the games to one side or the other?  I know a few of us have talked about this in the past but everyone thought we were crazy.  It's more obvious every year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Kuhndog94 said:

The refs desperately tried to hand the game away. 

I don't know if the NFL, ESPN and/or the refs wanted the Colts to win or to at least make it a game. I imagine the Panthers winning 23-6 isn't good for business. 

It's the NFL.  It's the only thing that makes sense because the officials hardly ever face consequences for bad calls.  They keep doing it weekly and you never hear anything.  In fact, even refs with bad ratings get to ref playoff games and whatnot because of their system.   The only reason we probably got the game against Luck was because they wanted Luck to crush us so they could compare Cam to Luck and choose Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know about this game or Cam vs Luck, but if you think there isn't some form of tampering going on in a multi billion dollar industry, then you don't understand how capitalism works.

You don't leave everything up to "chance" and "fair competition" when this kind of money is at stake. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

You know, I wouldn't have cared if the Colts were getting flags for TACKLING OUR D-LINEMAN TO THE GROUND all game.  Short was held literally, all game, no joke.  I mean, I seen jersey in hands that second half with no calls.

Also, are people finally starting to come around to the fact the refs are pushing the games to one side or the other?  I know a few of us have talked about this in the past but everyone thought we were crazy.  It's more obvious every year.

Absolutely! I actually paused the game once to show my wife (who was not pleased with my incessant screaming at the TV at midnight) KK's jersey completely turned around after TWO linemen pulled him away from Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look the refs were terrible.  The botched review, the clock stopping when tackled in bounds, the additional time added to the play clocks.  But let's face it...

 

The extended arm wrapped around the guy you're blocking will get a holding call more often than not.  You can't have an arm wrapped around the back of the defender you're blocking.  

 

The problem is that the colts did it multiple times and it wasn't called.  That's bullshit.  All I want is a consistent application of the rules.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Bucs waived shilo sanders after he got ejected. 
    • I'm just tired of ppl saying he's so accurate and then have to see recievers slow down to recieve the ball, ruining any chance at YAC
    • Some people will really look at stuff like this and say "no more excuses" but then make excuses to try and explain away the validity of big-time throws. 🙃   Back on topic though, as I mentioned in the other AT thread earlier, I hope that the team is still exploring the deal. If the Vikings want the Panthers to take on some of the salary, then it had better be at worst a 4th-round pick (though I imagine Dan angling for a 3rd). If they're willing to take on all of it, then maybe at worst a 5th. Tough pill to swallow, giving up a 4th for a 35yr old WR, but if MIN believes they can have similar success behind McCarthy then it could be a smart deal for them. Hell, if AT has any gas in the tank and gives them a 1yr sweetheart deal to close out at home, even better for Minnesota. Yea, Bryce loses his best and most reliable WR. Hunter Renfrow though isn't what I would call a huge step down though (if he's as advertised throughout camp), and it gives more reps to TMac + XL + Coker. This season is all about continued development and answering some of the looming questions (Is Bryce the guy? Is Evero the DC going fwd? How do the young WRs develop? How long does it take this defense to bounce back from being historically awful?).
×
×
  • Create New...