Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Terrell Davis says Cam is no MVP


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

Was watching the NFL Network yesterday and Davis and Co were talking about Cam and what he has done this season. Davis immediately starts talking about Cam's accuracy, how horrible his QBR is and his turnovers... said he shouldn't even be in the discussion for MVP. 

Oh yeh, here's another first in NFL history for Cam... first qb to lead a team to 7-0 while throwing a td and running for at least 20 yards in every game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Was watching the NFL Network yesterday and Davis and Co were talking about Cam and what he has done this season. Davis immediately starts talking about Cam's accuracy, how horrible his QBR is and his turnovers... said he shouldn't even be in the discussion for MVP. 

Oh yeh, here's another first in NFL history for Cam... first qb to lead a team to 7-0 while throwing a td and running for at least 20 yards in every game.

Stats are so pointless often to talk about.

take INTs.  How many of his have been TDs or balls within the 5 that were totally on the WR? Stats don't tell that....stat says QB was horrible.  Stats don't tell about half our games have been outside in the rain.  Stats don't tell you anything situational.

QB 1 could have 300 yards and 1 TD and 1 INT and QB 2 could have identical numbers.  One could of played great and he other horrific.   Stats don't tell one got them all in garbage time and the other INT wasn't even his fault. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The issue is people have different definitions of what the league MVP is.  The main one that people have, including TD, is that you basically have the most eye popping stats and dominant performance for your position.  Like Brady's insane QBR and TD to INT ratio at the moment; and they fact they are 7-0.  Then you have people that think it's the player that is 'most valuable' to their team, more so than any other player in the league.  This is where Cam comes into the conversation.  He's led Carolina to a 7-0 record, including multiple clutch game winning drives, and he's done this with "media nobodies" at the WR position.  He absolutely deserves to be in the MVP race, due to that latter.  But at the end of the season, the MVP winner will most likely be chosen based on stats and W-L record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fug that busted knee, bucket headed bitch.  Has he seen what he's throwing to lol?

The entire recieving corps outside of Cotchery has iffy hands and hes played in at least two complete downpours.

The vast majority of national pundits and analysts listened to or watched have loved what Cam is doing and acknowledge his supporting cast is likely the worst there is...  Just a few that come to mind - Mike and Mike, Cris Carter, Steve Young, Trent Dilfer, Ryen Russilll, Danny Kannell, Deion, Willie McGinest, and Michael Robinson...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, X-Clown on 1 said:

The issue is people have different definitions of what the league MVP is.  The main one that people have, including TD, is that you basically have the most eye popping stats and dominant performance for your position.  Like Brady's insane QBR and TD to INT ration at the moment; and they fact they are 7-0.  Then you have people that think it's the player that is 'most valuable' to their team, more so than any other player in the league.  This is where Cam comes into the conversation.  He's led Carolina to a 7-0 record, including multiple clutch game winning drives, and he's done this with "media nobody's" at the WR position.  He absolutely deserves to be in the MVP race, due to that latter.  But at the end of the season, the MVP winner will most likely be chosen based on stats and W-L record.

Regardless of what people want it to be it's the first one in reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...