Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For a little perspective on Cams effect for our offense


BigBoss

Recommended Posts

And how sorry our running game has been most this year.

With Cams yards, we are second in the league in rushing.

Without Cams yards we fall to 22 in the league in rushing

Stewart is not having a pro bowl year rushing he is roughly 14th in the league in rushing even though he is 7th in the league in overall attempts

We average the most rush at 33 in the league, but Cam takes 9 of those.

So not only is he the sole reason why our passing game does anything (cause the receivers are hardly helping) but it's mostly Cam's doing that our running game isn't completely mediocre at best.

Our line also had a slow start to the season. I'm curious what the PFF reports would say about the run blocking of Remmers and Oher, because I know our guards rank quite high.

I know stewy has had two good tough games, but when we talk about "is Cam an MVP candidate?" Let's appreciate how little of nothing he has around him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anybody watching would realize Stew is playing at a Pro Bowl level even if the stats don't suggest it. And the o-line has been great. Obviously Cam is our MVP on offense but don't discredit other players to bring Cam up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, thomas96 said:

Anybody watching would realize Stew is playing at a Pro Bowl level even if the stats don't suggest it. And the o-line has been great. Obviously Cam is our MVP on offense but don't discredit other players to bring Cam up.

This coming from the guy who thinks we will go 19-0 if we beat the packers.

If he was playing at a pro bowl level, his stats would sure indicate a lot more than they do. Seattle and Philly, he played at a pro bowl level outside of that, not so much. You haven't provided any convincing points to validate your statemetn

1 hour ago, The Huddler said:

I already know all this stuff. Every thread is trying to convince me that were awesome in some way. I know this. 

Would you prefer topics discussing how garbage we are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, thomas96 said:

Anybody watching would realize Stew is playing at a Pro Bowl level even if the stats don't suggest it. And the o-line has been great. Obviously Cam is our MVP on offense but don't discredit other players to bring Cam up.

You can't have a running back only running for 4.0 ypc and say he's having a Pro Bowl season if you're going to also say the line has been great. Because if the line has been consistently great, any Pro Bowl back should be able to get at least 4.5 ypc. The reality is he's gotten a lot of tough yards behind a line that occasionally struggles on run blocking. He hasn't been playing at a Pro Bowl level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BigBoss said:

This coming from the guy who thinks we will go 19-0 if we beat the packers.

If he was playing at a pro bowl level, his stats would sure indicate a lot more than they do. Seattle and Philly, he played at a pro bowl level outside of that, not so much. You haven't provided any convincing points to validate your statemetn

Would you prefer topics discussing how garbage we are?

A fan in fan mode wanting to believe that we'll go undefeated... Hang the man. 

 

1 hour ago, Raucous said:

You can't have a running back only running for 4.0 ypc and say he's having a Pro Bowl season if you're going to also say the line has been great. Because if the line has been consistently great, any Pro Bowl back should be able to get at least 4.5 ypc. The reality is he's gotten a lot of tough yards behind a line that occasionally struggles on run blocking. He hasn't been playing at a Pro Bowl level.

The line has been great compared to last season, and particularly in pass blocking. Which benefits Cam and not Stew. Further backing up my point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, BigBoss said:

This coming from the guy who thinks we will go 19-0 if we beat the packers.

If he was playing at a pro bowl level, his stats would sure indicate a lot more than they do. Seattle and Philly, he played at a pro bowl level outside of that, not so much. You haven't provided any convincing points to validate your statemetn

Would you prefer topics discussing how garbage we are?

Yeah so i can argue with the fugtards

 

lol jk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, thomas96 said:

Anybody watching would realize Stew is playing at a Pro Bowl level even if the stats don't suggest it. And the o-line has been great. Obviously Cam is our MVP on offense but don't discredit other players to bring Cam up.

I would not say the line was great. They pass block well but do not punch holes in the run game very much.  I hope we keep drafting guys cause we need improvement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what the OP wants.  We all know that Cam has been the MAN this year.  He runs the ball well, and has made a poor group of receives look absolutely average!

Talking about Stewart and the Oline, and why we aren't averaging 6 ypc or whatever crazy figure is deemed a successful running game.  EVERYONE knows we're going to run the ball.  That's Shula ball.  We're going to keep running, even if it's just for a couple yards at a time.  We are running against 8-9 man fronts all day long because no one is really scared of our passing game aside from Greg Olsen.  The jury is out on Ginn, he will drop balls.  Sure he might catch a few, but he's going to drop a good number of passes.

Stewart has been running super hard. it's not flashy, but he is having a very good year.  He's getting those tough yards, breaking tackles and wearing down defenses.  We're not a flashy running team, we are a persistent running team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can only imagine the **** eating grins on the committee right now. "Oh, Bama didn't deserve it? Oh, Miami didn't deserve it? Suck it, haters!" lol
    • To say that, is gaslighting, because it isn’t true. I mean, maybe one or two people do that but it isn’t the predominant behavior. Even Frank has given him credit. I think particularly the Rams game. A couple of glowing posts.   I know I have. Gotta be honest about it because if you aren’t it undermines what else you say.  But the degree of how far I go with credit, in terms of it being a projection of future performance? Not very far. Acknowledge it, but require more of it. There is a lot of bad play to offset.    I tried to remain passive while the last 9 games (post ankle injury) played out. It is just really hard when the lows won’t go away. I failed. As high as a couple of those highs were, there isn’t enough.    I know it is premature to just say I want to move on, made my decision after 6 of those games ended up pretty much really good or not good enough, but I have had enough of being patient and letting him show the reality either way.  So in my view, he Could still validate himself to a decent degree if he smokes the last three starts. But also in my view I don’t expect to see it. Maybe one more high quality start, would be my expectation. So yes he could still somehow justify having the job next year. If that happened I still wouldn’t have much faith given the last three years and all that has transpired. Again, there is a lot of bad play to offset. 
    • To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
×
×
  • Create New...