Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Mills up for HOF vote


PntherPryd

Recommended Posts

http://www.nfl.com/hofvote?campaign=tw-nf-sf15640903-sf15640903

http://www.talkoffamenetwork.com/state-your-case-sam-mills/

The saints are tweeting out asking for followers to vote for Sam Mills.  I know we've had posts about this but can't get them to pull up in search.  I know the player chooses which team he goes in as but does anyone know if Sam Mills family has made a decision?  Any chance he goes in as a Panther?   It won't affect my vote, I already voted for him as saint or Panther.... just curious.

They are whittling a list of 108 players to 25.  Lots of names on their that I totally did not agree with so I came nowhere close to voting for 25.  But the second link is a good article about why Sam belongs without gawdy stats.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

It's not baseball. He'd go in as a Saint and Panther. Just like we technically have just as much ownership of Reggie White in the Hall of Fame as do the Packers and Eagles.

Yep. In the NFL you don't go in as a member of a certain team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't go in as a member of a particular team.  Reggie White has the Panthers logo under his name same as the Eagles and Packers.  http://www.profootballhof.com/players/reggie-white/

Would love to see Mills in.  My question is when he gets in the HoF (I'm speaking it into existence) who would do his speech for him or have they abolished deceased HoFers having someone do a speech on their behalf or "introducing" them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...