Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

*IF* the Patriots win tonight *AND* the Panthers win on Thanksgiving...


Montsta

Recommended Posts

At what point do we see the NFL do what they can to help two undefeated teams square off in the golden anniversary Super Bowl 50?

I brought this up in another thread but it was already somewhat buried and I'm genuinely curious as to what the Huddle conspiracy theorists think?

I know it's a commonly accepted idea around here that the referees hate the Panthers, which I personally think is BS, but if people really believe notice comes from up high in the offices on Park Avenue to lean towards certain teams winning, do you think with each passing week the NFL would do what they could to try and make a Patriots-Panthers super mega ultra bowl happen?

That would guarantee an undefeated season for someone, would have a rematch from a prior SB, would have Tom Brady perhaps securing his spot as greatest QB ever, and Cam Newton perhaps cementing his spot as one of the best rising stars in the league. 

Again, I don't necessarily buy that the NFL has pre-scripted narratives that they like to lean on, but for those that do, what do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NFL definitely has scripted narratives. They will never admit it, but look at what they've done for the Pats. There are multiple rules created specifically for Tom Brady alone.

I think it starts on Thanksgiving day IF* Pats win tonight. If anyone would recognize it, it would be Panthers fans, that's for sure as we usually historically have gotten the brown end of that stick.

*tin foil hat off*

#KeepPounding

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 15 said:

I don't think the NFL wants the Panthers to even sniff SB50. They would rather have the underdog Giants knock off the Patriots once again in the bowl than see that damn Sir Cameron Newton: Leader of Men, Lover of Puppies...Esquire dancing around.

you realize the superbowl the panthers were in was one of the best SB's in history, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 15 said:

I don't think the NFL wants the Panthers to even sniff SB50. They would rather have the underdog Giants knock off the Patriots once again in the bowl than see that damn Sir Cameron Newton: Leader of Men, Lover of Puppies, Alpha Male of Football...Esquire dancing around.

FIFY, if the All-Pro section is to be believed. ;) which of course it is!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thebigcat said:

the narrative of the possibility of a Super Bowl rematch with undefeated teams.... ESPN, NFL and just about every network, Vegas would explode with money

This is my thinking. It would be the biggest super bowl of all time bar none. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, thebigcat said:

it's what cemented Dan Morgan as an immortal what he did in that game

This.  One of the best individual defensive performances I've ever seen at any level.  The man was EVERYWHERE in that Super Bowl.  It seemed like he made every Panthers tackle that day.

You can tell the recent Panthers fans because they don't get all dreamy eyed followed by slight sadness when the Morgan's name is mentioned

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, 15 said:

What does that have to do with anything? You're telling me the NFL would rather risk a small market franchise going to the super bowl than a large market team?

It doesn't matter. The Super Bowl is ratings proof. It'll have over 100 million viewers no matter who is playing. It's not even about the game anymore. The commercials are just as big of an attraction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...