Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Norman's Trash Talking


t96

Trash talking good or bad?  

118 members have voted

  1. 1. Trash talking good or bad?



Recommended Posts

Good or bad?

 

Quote

Norman was clearly in Bryant's head early. When Panthers safety Kurt Coleman picked off Romo on the first drive of the game, Bryant and Norman stood behind the play yapping when it appeared the Cowboys receiver could have had a chance to stop a touchdown, if he made an effort.

"Me and him were having choice words," Norman said of the play, "then I pointed at Kurt as he scored and I said, 'Look at that, Now take that back to your huddle and come back again.'"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a problem. Corner is a position where you're going to have to talk a bit. You've got to have swagger to play well at that position. I feel the same for WR. Just try not to pick up any taunting or unsportsmanlike penalties. I do know they'll happen occasionally, though 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, nothing wrong with a lil talking if you're able to back up your talk. That's the rule in the neighborhood: talk all you want, just be able to back it up. Otherwise, you look silly out there. 

So far, Josh can back up the talk he's talking. Lol, I remember Smitty used to get in the heads of opposing CB's early, effectively taking them out of the game mentally 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

I would be mad if Coleman fumbled and we were a man down to recover it because he was too busy talking to notice what was happening on the play.

Norman basically blocked Dez out of the play without ever actually touching him. I'm fine with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Correct this logic I might if it meant taking his guaranteed money now and spread it over 3 years (2026-2028) and maybe add $6m.  I am not sure you can do that, or that he would do it, but it would be a way for him to extend his career and bank accounts and we would be getting him for $6m for 2 years (if healthy), basically, since his entire salary is guaranteed now.  If not, we lose an additional $6m spread over 2 years.  So let's say his guaranteed $$ for 2026 is $18m.  Give him a $24m contract ($8m per) through 2028.  Worst case:  We get $10m in cap relief now and create $3m dead cap for 2 years (2027-8).   Best case?  We get cap relief now and a good/decent guard/tackle for 2 years (2027-2028) and the total salary per year when he is active would be $12m if you don't count any money for the season he cannot play.  That is a good value, and we'd basically be getting a 50% discount rate.  Since we have so much guaranteed now, extending him is not as crazy as it seems.   Something has to be wrong with this logic...      
    • I don't disagree about Nikishin's potential availability, but Hamilton as a replacement? Not an upgrade in my book.
×
×
  • Create New...