Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WCO, Coryell, E-P....


Cyberjag

Recommended Posts

Shula-Newton?

I've been reading all season about how Shula has tailored our offense specifically to Cam's strengths.  Like the WCO and Coryell systems, it's based on a power running game.  Like Coryell, we use that to set up the deep pass.  Like E-P, we have many potential runs off the same look.  And there's a big element of the zone read in play as well.

I'm just tossing this out there for conversation, and think it's interesting to consider.  If we have sustained success on offense for many seasons to come running this system, you know that other OCs in the league will break it down and imitate it.  Netwon's success is surely going to inspire other kids to play QB when they maybe pass the eye test for LB or DE.  He's the first like him, but won't be the last.  And right now, you could even argue that a QB like EJ Manuel or even (*shudder*) Colin Kaepernick could be effective in this system.  Frankly, I think it's one that could make The Golden Calf of Bristol look like an NFL QB.

If that happens, the sustained success and imitator that is, do you think this offense will take on an identity of it's own like E-P or Coryell?  Will future football fans talk about how their team is going to change from a WCO to a Shula?  

Could that happen?  Why or why not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, future talk, how easy to predict! =P

It depends on how well it translates to some of those other players AND if we win championships.  For the WCO, the reason it was successful was that it was extremely difficult to defend against and the 49ers won many super bowls with it.  So long as you had a smart QB who could read a defense, he could make these 5 yard throws all day and allow the WRs to get YAC.  It still works in variation today.

Now will the Shula-Cam offense become a thing?  That I'm not sure of because how many people will want an offense that grinds it out versus the high flying 400 yards passing offenses that fans seem to love?  I swear, it does seem like fans would be fine losing so long as they won in the fantasy game (that's a whole different issue).  

We have to keep winning, consistently, and other teams have to be able to copy it and have success.  Cam has gotten really good at the reading/manipulating/throwing part of the whole QB thing where guys like Kaep and GCoB we never very good at that.  You'd still have to have the right QB and the right players to make it work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is the exact reason Chip Kelly's Offense isn't working. Minus the fact he got rid of every bright spot on his offense.

But in my opinion, it was to get Mariota so he could run that style of offense. You can't have someone 6 years removed from a college style offense and try to bring them back to one, when from the start even in college they were in a spread offense. Also, even if you have a quarterback right out of college who can run that kind of offense, he has to develop into a pocket passer if he's not already because no quarterback is going to run in this league for 10 years without lots of injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CarolinaXblue said:

I think this is the exact reason Chip Kelly's Offense isn't working. Minus the fact he got rid of every bright spot on his offense.

But in my opinion, it was to get Mariota so he could run that style of offense. You can't have someone 6 years removed from a college style offense and try to bring them back to one, when from the start even in college they were in a spread offense. Also, even if you have a quarterback right out of college who can run that kind of offense, he has to develop into a pocket passer if he's not already because no quarterback is going to run in this league for 10 years without lots of injury.

Kelly's offense doesnt work for a variety of reasons. This has nothing to do with it, remember that Nick Foles was lighting people up in that system. Theres too few plays in their playbook and they dont do enough to set up the defenses theyre going against. They take away talent from their roster and now theyre puzzled.

 

That system is reckless, injury prone and predictable. In fact, ours is almost the vice versa of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm typing in bed so I'm gking off memory here but I do believe that EP was originally a run based variation of WCO until Charlie Weis evolved it to what the Patriots are doing today. 

 

Give me the QB who can make the middle and deep throws over the dinky dunks offense QB that a 50 year old Jimmy Clausen can throw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can has finally become a true dual threat QB. In fact, he is the only pocket/power rushing QB in the game. 

Can he throw for 300+ yards every game? Not with our WR corp...no. That's not his fault, but once LB gets back and Funchess develops, he will have that opportunity so he can age-well and so that we won't have to rely on his running capabilities to get first-downs.

all of this is predicated upon a rush-first offense and a dynamo defense that keeps our offense on the field and to get to the level this team is currently operating, having elite-defensive and offensive weapons have to be on the field making plays.

there isn't another team in the league besides maybe Seattle that could mimic what the Panthers do and their version is not nearly as effective as our Panthers.

i don't see another team with the personnel needed to play this way and I doubt any team will be able to do this anytime soon...copy-cat or not (pun intended.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think this offense is unique enough to warrant its own recognition anymore than what Brady does in New England.  With offenses becoming amalgamations of different systems it is likely even inaccurate to call them a WCO or a Coryell system given most teams use elements of several systems. So no I don't think that there will be the Shula. Still I think that more OCs may start to try and maximize their system to fit their personnel instead of trying to fit their personnel into their system.  But that requires teams to be consistent with their coordinators and stick with guys instead of dumping them  for the new best thing. I was watching the game last night and was amazed at how many different coaches, GMs, and changes they have had in Cleveland over the past 7 years. No wonder they suck every year. No continuity at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, TheNewStandard said:

Can has finally become a true dual threat QB. In fact, he is the only pocket/power rushing QB in the game. 

Can he throw for 300+ yards every game? Not with our WR corp...no. That's not his fault, but once LB gets back and Funchess develops, he will have that opportunity so he can age-well and so that we won't have to rely on his running capabilities to get first-downs.

all of this is predicated upon a rush-first offense and a dynamo defense that keeps our offense on the field and to get to the level this team is currently operating, having elite-defensive and offensive weapons have to be on the field making plays.

there isn't another team in the league besides maybe Seattle that could mimic what the Panthers do and their version is not nearly as effective as our Panthers.

i don't see another team with the personnel needed to play this way and I doubt any team will be able to do this anytime soon...copy-cat or not (pun intended.)

N=/=M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, h0llywood said:

I'm typing in bed so I'm gking off memory here but I do believe that EP was originally a run based variation of WCO until Charlie Weis evolved it to what the Patriots are doing today. 

 

Give me the QB who can make the middle and deep throws over the dinky dunks offense QB that a 50 year old Jimmy Clausen can throw.

The EP is not a run based version of the WCO offense. It differs both in philosophy and play calling and is rather robust including most offenses not classified as a WCO or Coryell system. 

And Weiss helped develop the NE version of the EP but it existed before him and they are not synonymous. If you look at New England they run different schemes based on their personnel more so than a dedication to one system or another. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Cyberjag said:

And right now, you could even argue that a QB like EJ Manuel or even (*shudder*) Colin Kaepernick could be effective in this system.  

The system only works because Cam is actually a good passer.  It doesn't matter how athletic you are, you still have to be able to pass.

Manuel has no accuracy and Kaepernick, mentally, just isn't there in regards to his Football IQ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Razeyfingers said:

Kelly's offense doesnt work for a variety of reasons. This has nothing to do with it, remember that Nick Foles was lighting people up in that system. Theres too few plays in their playbook and they dont do enough to set up the defenses theyre going against. They take away talent from their roster and now theyre puzzled.

 

That system is reckless, injury prone and predictable. In fact, ours is almost the vice versa of it.

I'll agree to disagree. Not with all of it, just some of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

I don't think this offense is unique enough to warrant its own recognition anymore than what Brady does in New England.  With offenses becoming amalgamations of different systems it is likely even inaccurate to call them a WCO or a Coryell system given most teams use elements of several systems. So no I don't think that there will be the Shula. Still I think that more OCs may start to try and maximize their system to fit their personnel instead of trying to fit their personnel into their system.  But that requires teams to be consistent with their coordinators and stick with guys instead of dumping them  for the new best thing. I was watching the game last night and was amazed at how many different coaches, GMs, and changes they have had in Cleveland over the past 7 years. No wonder they suck every year. No continuity at all.

I think is a better summation.  The NFL is less system based and more personnel based.  Folks should play to their player's strengths to get the most out of it.  Some teams are able to slot guys into a system because they do the system's jobs well.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The referee assigned to this game is Shawn Smith. This is a critical data point for betting purposes because his crew has one of the most distinct, long-term statistical biases in the NFL. "Road Team" Bias: Historically, Shawn Smith is known as the "Road Team Referee." In a league where home teams usually win ~55% of the time, home teams in Smith's games have historically won at a rate far below league average (often hovering around 40-42%). Against The Spread (ATS): The trend is even starker here. Home teams have covered the spread at a rate of roughly 37-40% in his career. The Mechanism: Analysis shows his crew tends to call a higher rate of False Start and Unnecessary Roughness penalties on the Home Team. This negates the traditional home-field advantage (crowd noise causing false starts for the visitors). Impact on This Game: This specific assignment heavily favors the Buccaneers (Road Team). If you believe the referee influences the game, Smith's presence suggests the Panthers will struggle to get "home cooking" calls and may face untimely procedural flags that stall drives. The Panthers have only had Shawn Smith officiate four home games since he became a head referee in 2018, and they are all losses. Date Opponent Result Score Nov 24, 2024 vs. Kansas City Chiefs Loss 27–30 Oct 9, 2022 vs. San Francisco 49ers Loss 15–37 Dec 12, 2021 vs. Atlanta Falcons Loss 21–29 Nov 25, 2018 vs. Seattle Seahawks Loss 27–30 Considering the how rare it is for Shawn Smith to officiate a Panthers game at all, this seems like an odd time to assign him to a Panthers game, unless the NFL wants to kill the Panthers season once and for all.  The Panthers' offensive line situation creates a "perfect storm" for referee Shawn Smith's specific tendency to call False Starts on the home team. The "Carousel" Factor (Communication Vulnerability) The most damning stat for the Panthers' offensive line in 2025 is their lack of continuity. The Stat: By Week 13, the Panthers had already fielded their 10th different offensive line combination. The Impact: False starts are often "communication penalties"—they happen when a guard doesn't hear the center's snap count or a tackle anticipates the wrong cadence. A unit that hasn't played together struggles with non-verbal communication. The Shawn Smith Multiplier: Shawn Smith’s crew calls False Starts at a high rate on home teams. He will likely look for flinches on the exterior of the line. A disjointed line that is constantly rotating players (due to the injuries of starters like Cade Mays and the illness issues with Robert Hunt earlier this season) is "fresh meat" for this specific referee bias. The Specific Culprits (2025 Penalties) Ikem Ekwonu (LT): Leads the team with 4 False Start penalties this season. He is the most frequent violator on the line. Taylor Moton (RT): Has been flagged for 3 False Starts. The Trap: Smith’s crew often focuses on the tackles (the players furthest from the ball) jumping early to get an edge on speed rushers. Since Ekwonu struggles with this discipline naturally, having a referee who hunts for it is a massive disadvantage. The "Managed Outcome" Synthesis The "Bucs Cover" Script: If the desired outcome is a Buccaneers win to solidify their playoff standing, the officials simply have to apply the letter of the law. Calling strict False Starts on a confused, banged-up Panthers O-line will consistently put them in "3rd and Long" situations, killing their drives and allowing the Bucs (-3.5) to cover easily. The "Close Game" Script: If the desired outcome is "Week 18 Drama" (keeping the division tied), look for the officials to ignore the Panthers' twitchy tackles. If Ekwonu jumps a split-second early and no flag is thrown, it effectively neutralizes the Bucs' pass rush, allowing the Panthers to keep the score close. Summary of the Edge Vulnerability: Extreme. The Panthers are playing backup interior linemen (like Jake Curhan or practice squad call-ups) next to jumpy tackles. Betting Implication: This strongly reinforces the Bucs -3 or -3.5 play. The combination of a "Road Team Referee" and a "Home Team O-Line in chaos" suggests the Panthers will beat themselves with procedural penalties. Based on the collision of the hard data (Referee bias + Offensive Line injuries) and the soft narratives ("Managed Outcomes"), here is the definitive recommendation. If you have to place a single Moneyline bet to win this game straight up: The Pick: Tampa Bay Buccaneers (-165) While the "Entertainment Script" hints at a Panthers upset to keep the division messy, the structural disadvantage the Panthers face in this specific matchup is too massive to ignore. Here is why the Buccaneers are the stong moneyline play: 1. The "Shawn Smith" Road-Field Advantage This is the decisive factor. In the NFL, Home Field Advantage usually accounts for about 1.5 to 2 points of value. The Reality: Referee Shawn Smith negates that advantage entirely. His crew calls penalties in a way that historically suppresses home crowd momentum (False Starts, holding). The Result: You are essentially getting the Buccaneers on a neutral field (or even a "pseudo-home" field) against a team with a worse roster. 2. The "Drive-Killer" Synergy To win as an underdog, the Panthers need to play a clean, mistake-free game to keep drives alive. The combination of Panthers' 10th O-Line combo + Jump-prone Tackles (Ekwonu) + A Referee who hunts False Starts is a recipe for disaster. The Scenario: Expect the Panthers to face multiple "1st and 15" or "3rd and 12" situations due to procedural flags. These drive-killers will force them to punt or settle for field goals, while the Bucs' offense (led by Mayfield) stays on schedule. 3. The "TV Product" Counter-Argument You asked about the "Managed Outcome." While a Panthers win creates "chaos," the NFL also values Star Power in the playoffs. Baker Mayfield and the Buccaneers are a proven national TV draw with recent playoff history. If the league has to choose between "Chaos" (Panthers) and "Ratings/Legitimacy" (Bucs), the "Script" likely leans toward ensuring the Buccaneers—the more marketable team—secure the division lead. They won't "fix" the game against the Panthers, but they won't intervene to save them from their own penalties. Final Verdict Betting on the Panthers requires you to hope for a miracle 4th-quarter collapse. Betting on the Buccaneers requires you to trust that a superior roster—aided by a favorable officiating crew—will control the game for the first 45 minutes. Take the Buccaneers Moneyline. The "Safe" money is on the Ref. The Prediction: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Win and Cover Projected Score: Buccaneers 27, Panthers 17 The Bet: Buccaneers -3 (or Moneyline -165) Confidence Level: High on the Winner; Moderate on the Spread (due to potential "garbage time" variance).
    • He isn't a good HC. I think he has proved that conclusively.
    • The missed tackle percentage is on that screen cap.
×
×
  • Create New...