Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Comments on NOLA article


Gregg S

Recommended Posts

Found these comments following this article from NOLA.com. http://www.nola.com/saints/index.ssf/2015/12/nfl_picks_week_13_bengals_bear.html#incart_river_index  I was surprised when I read them as I've never even remotely heard this about TD.  Taints fans, though.  What else should I expect?   And the second comment below is lulz worthy.  The irony of the statement is palpable.

 

ahzroc2 hours ago
 
 

 

Thomas Davis is the dirtiest player in the nfl. Speared khiry

Launched at the chin of graham and the other te who never plays and I can't remember his name, injured texans rb this guy has to go

 

LikeReply
 
 
calik5
 
 
calik52 hours ago
 
 

 

The Panthers have cheaters for players.. at least we lose honestly..

if your team can't win games without PED's.. your team ain't nothing!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, pepaw said:

Wtf are they talking about PEDs? And any Saints fan complaining about a team being dirty needs to watch their team in the Greg Williams era.  

Dumbest fanbase in the NFL. Period.

Probably the recent Horton PED suspension

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can understand how that perception can arise about other teams when you watch soft football as long as they have.

I've never sern any fanbase in all of my years so enamored with statistics and frustrated by teams that not only don't care for them but stop others from doing so ad we did to them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...