Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marshawn Lynch ruled OUT for Sunday


Beast Mode

Recommended Posts

For those saying the Seahawks offense has been better without Lynch, yeah that's true because Thomas Rawls largely outperformed Lynch. This is significant because the Vikings run D was ranked #17. Now, without Lynch or Rawls, the Vikings will be able to shut down the Seahawks running game especially with Linval Joseph back, the best run stuffing DT in the league. Add in the -15 temperature that will affect those touch passes that Wilson likes and this becomes a very interesting game. This helps the Vikings offense a lot IMO because now they will run AP like 20+ times in a low scoring game, instead of abandoning the run like last time and relying on Bridgewater.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jdpanther5 said:

Well, we won't get to play both. If the Vikings win today they go to Arizona. 

You mean we won't get to play the Vikes. We don't play both no matter who wins. 

I'm hoping the Hawks and Packers lose and we get that team we've already whipped by 4 TD's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Beast Mode said:

Face it you all secretly want Seattle to win so we can be friends another week. 

But really.. I figured there'd be some interest here given Seattle is one of your 3 possible opponents.  

There is. If you didn't start it, someone else would have. I do think it hurts Seattle. Basically because no one would want to hit Lynch in subzero weather, just like NOBODY is going to want to hit AP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, beastson said:

They've been without him most of the season it seems. Honestly none of that weather, beast out and that shade poo jeremy posted matters. You still have to line up and play the game

Only because Thomas Rawls has been way better than Lynch. He had 101 yards on 19 carries against the Vikings in the first game. Now, he's out too. Lynch would have been the perfect RB for this type of game in -15 weather, especially against a #17 ranked Vikings run defense. Now, the Seahawks have non-factors at RB with a tendency to fumble, which only gets worse in this type of weather.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The last child @ home has told me he wants to go to a game, so we're seeing vs Rams on the 30th
    • Did we really shut them down though? They had 369 yards of offense.   That is 9 more yards than they average per game and 53 more than we give up per game this year.   If a team gave up 369 yards per game on defense, they'd be the 7th worst defense in the league this year. Yes, I will give our defense credit for having the 4th down stand near our goal line as well as creating the fumble that stopped their first drive, as they did rise to the occasion then, but even the INT was just a ridiculous play/throw and handed it to us and they also missed a FG. We didn't force them into a single punt all game.  We had 1 sack on a QB who had 37 pass attempts. They had drives of 56, 49, 50, 43, 58, and 71 yards (while we only had 2 over 40 yards ourselves). We bent, a lot, but never really broke, partially due to the Packers own mistakes, that's a far cry from "shutting them down" in my opinion.  Again, this is why I'm critical of us after a day like today, I'm able to look beyond a final score and evaluate how we played on the whole, and we keep squeaking out these wins despite not playing well at all.  And yes, that is what great teams do, but they also play well in the majority of their games, where as all we seem to do is squeak out ugly wins without ever playing all that well. I'm not saying I'm unhappy that we won, I've never once said anything like that, but when week after week I see serious concerns with how we played, then I'm going to call out what I see.
    • Washington is going to have to do better than this
×
×
  • Create New...