Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Seahawks Fans Are Saying - Playoff Edition


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, WeAre12 said:

First you flat-out lie about how the SOS schedule is determined then you come back with a "logic" accusation with ZERO facts to support your argument. Carolina had one of he easiest schedules in the NFL this year and that isn't just me talking it's NFL announcers, NFL sportswriters, and the NFL itself! Now, you are either a compulsive liar or a complete idiot. Which is it?

Beg of Year SOS is determined from how teams finished the previous year.  Once the new season starts, that SOS is completely irrelevant.

YOU were talking about SOS and 2014 records....not me douchebag.

I have not looked at calculating this year's SOS based on how opponents finished THIS year.  Even if Seattle played a tougher schedule, you LOST SEVEN fuging GAMES (yea, you fuging lost to the Lions and everyone knows it).  You are also 3-4 against teams that made the playoffs this season....we are 4-0.

Any way you slice it, Seattle is NOT as good as we are.....we know it.....hell, deep down in place you don't like to talk about, even YOU know it.

So, either have an intelligent discussion (which based on your apparent IQ is impossible), or GTFO of my yard before I release the hounds on your granola eating ass.  Your stench of body odor is funking up the place.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few days in and i still hate that we even have to entertain Seattle fans. They were beaten by Minnesota. They shouldn't be here. They did nothing to win that game, Minnesota did everything to lose it. Good news is I only have to hear them for a little while longer. Come Sunday eve, Seahawk nation will have been silenced, left to ponder why their luck ran out only a game away from the NFCC game. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

Here is what Seattle fans think 101.

hey, Seahawks D is so much better now! LOB BABY!! (Ignores the fact they got abused by a TE last weekend in the 4th to put the game away.  Basically as recently as a week ago showed they are what they have been all year. Ignores he fact they played a bunch of arena league caliber QBs to improve their stat sheet)

hey, Panthers are worse!!!! (Ignores the fact Cam was playing just okay early on in the season when we played and beat them.  Then Cam went utterly insane and became the MVP QB.  Which is how they will face now)

They are just fuging dumb....there is nothing anyone can do about that. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BANE said:

A few days in and i still hate that we even have to entertain Seattle fans. They were beaten by Minnesota. They shouldn't be here. They did nothing to win that game, Minnesota did everything to lose it. Good news is I only have to hear them for a little while longer. Come Sunday eve, Seahawk nation will have been silenced, left to ponder why their luck ran out only a game away from the NFCC game. 

I agree..  They got outplayed by Minnesota and needed a botched chip shot to win, and for some reason that's gotten them all excited. A few more days and they're done for the year 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WeAre12 said:

Read the date dummy, the SOS is based on 2014 results, it has absolutely NOTHING to do with what happened this season.

You're a fugin idiot if you base strength of schedule off of last year's results.  Especially when the season has come to an end and it's easy to see exactly what the strength of schedule truly was.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, uncfan888 said:

I agree..  They got outplayed by Minnesota and needed a botched chip shot to win, and for some reason that's gotten them all excited. A few more days and they're done for the year 

I could understand their excitement if they blocked the kick, but nope, the dude just shanked the hell out of a chip shot FG. That steel curtain of a defense allowed Minn to go right down the field and get in FG range and the dude just doinks it. Ugh, the lucky bastards.  

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BANE said:

I could understand their excitement if they blocked the kick, but nope, the dude just shanked the hell out of a chip shot FG. That steel curtain of a defense allowed Minn to go right down the field and get in FG range and the dude just doinks it. Ugh, the lucky bastards.  

Did you even watch the game? Their "march" down the field was aided by 36 yds in penalties including a call against Chancellor that the Seahawks protested to the NFL head office. As for the missed FG, Sherman missed blocking the last one by one inch. Sherman was directly in the kicker's field of view and he psyched him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

You're a fugin idiot if you base strength of schedule off of last year's results.  Especially when the season has come to an end and it's easy to see exactly what the strength of schedule truly was.  

I am arguing with a complete moron. My bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WeAre12 said:

Did you even watch the game? Their "march" down the field was aided by 36 yds in penalties including a call against Chancellor that the Seahawks protested to the NFL head office. As for the missed FG, Sherman missed blocking the last one by one inch. Sherman was directly in the kicker's field of view and he psyched him.

Ah, so Sherman ALMOST blocked it... well ok then! LMFAO!!!

 

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, WeAre12 said:

Did you even watch the game? Their "march" down the field was aided by 36 yds in penalties including a call against Chancellor that the Seahawks protested to the NFL head office. As for the missed FG, Sherman missed blocking the last one by one inch. Sherman was directly in the kicker's field of view and he psyched him.

Apparently, Sherman's mere presence in someones line of view is enough to cause other players to suffer a complete brain aneurysm and loss of all sense of direction and motor skills.......

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...