Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offense and Momentum


Davis83

Recommended Posts

Forgive if already mentioned, but this crap where we start huddling and losing momentum sucks.  1st half, we pretty much ran a no huddle offense and moved the ball at will.  2nd half we're in the huddle every play and having to take TO's cause the play is late.  I know they are trying to eat the clock, but you can accomplish that in the no huddle too.  My god man, when the other team starts scoring, you have to let Cam do his thing and score some points too.  31 in a half - zip in the 2nd...sometimes we look like we are playing Fox ball again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I get the complaint, but the way things were going in the second half I can't feel too good about any strategy that potentially leaves more time on the clock.

Who says there would be more time though? More first downs and longer drives take time as well, and it would be irrelevant with more points on the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Who says there would be more time though? More first downs and longer drives take time as well, and it would be irrelevant with more points on the board.

And what if you don't?  Then what happens to your defense?

Heck, even if you do, your defense doesn't get much rest at a time when it looked like they needed it badly.  On the flipside, a slow sustained drive not only rests your defense, but wears on theirs.

It's basically the Chip Kelly approach, but remember Kelly wore his own defense out as much as he did the other team's.

Again, I understand the idea.  I just can't get behind it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I get the complaint, but the way things were going in the second half I can't feel too good about any strategy that potentially leaves more time on the clock.

Agree we needed to eat the clock up. Worse things the Panthers could have done is risk turning the ball over.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I get the complaint, but the way things were going in the second half I can't feel too good about any strategy that potentially leaves more time on the clock.

The Panthers run more time off the clock when they allow Cam to go no huddle and make adjustments at the line. Look at the drives. I would expect the coaches to know that. Not to mention Cam is more effective out of the no huddle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The announcer pointed out how when you slow play it disrupts the flow of the offense, and it was completely true in our case. How many timeouts did Cam have to waste not to get a delay of game? 

 

The second half was so frustrating, we were running on 1st and 2nd and hoping Cam can save us on third and long. Not only the offense but the defense went to a complete soft coverage. McClain and Finnegan were getting abused 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no excuse to slow the reins on your offense when it just dropped 31 in the first half.  NONE.   This defense has holes, when one is exploited you need points on the board to take the brunt of the damage.   We have the MVP on our team and we handcuffed him for half the game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

And what if you don't?  Then what happens to your defense?

Heck, even if you do, your defense doesn't get much rest at a time when it looked like they needed it badly.  On the flipside, a slow sustained drive not only rests your defense, but wears on theirs.

It's basically the Chip Kelly approach, but remember Kelly wore his own defense out as much as he did the other team's.

Again, I understand the idea.  I just can't get behind it.

Not necessarily. The Chip Kelly approach is to run the play as fast as possible. We could run the no huddle and have Cam sit there at the line reading the D and then not snapping it until the play clock is low and time is still running off. No huddle doesn't mean faster plays. Getting to the LoS faster is what's important in my opinion. I'm honestly not too upset about the second half. Of course we need to make adjustments and the defense sucked but as far as coaching goes I think they did well. We controlled the ball for 16 minutes in the 2nd half despite not scoring and only allowed Seattle to have 5 drives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

And what if you don't?  Then what happens to your defense?

Heck, even if you do, your defense doesn't get much rest at a time when it looked like they needed it badly.  On the flipside, a slow sustained drive not only rests your defense, but wears on theirs.

It's basically the Chip Kelly approach, but remember Kelly wore his own defense out as much as he did the other team's.

Again, I understand the idea.  I just can't get behind it.

They couldn't stop it in the first half, when Carolina had a huge advantage in TOP, so why decide to stop yourself in the second? I'm not saying go full Chip Kelly, but there's no reason to go into a shell in the third and completely disregard an offensive plan that already scored 24 points. My issue is that they only generated one 'slow, sustained drive' that ate any significant time, and a faster pace on an earlier drive may have taken MORE time by going farther and even gotten points. 

Like I said before, if they even get 3 points (or ideally 7 -14) in the third then this conversation isn't happening. Either way though, I'm very happy the team won. Don't want to lose sight of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
    • Sorry, but this is a terrible breakdown that doesn't at all show what you're trying to say/project about T-Mac next year, as it leaves out key information that changes everything, it makes the opposite point that you're trying to. Chase missed 5 games that second season after playing all 17 as a rookie (and still saw more targets that second season). Puka it looks like you projected his stats out to a 17 game season (as he only played 11 games), but even still , when you have 160+ targets as a rookie, there isn't really much room to get any more the next year. Waddle saw an increase in yards, and sure, his targets went down, but he played on a team with a better WR that year who saw 170 targets for 1,710 yards during that 2nd season for Waddle... something T-Mac doesn't have to contend with on the same team (280+ targets for their top 2 WRs, if you don't think T-Mac would see more than 122 targets if him and Coker combined for 287, then you're nuts). Then Olave and Wilson both saw an increase of 19 targets in their second season. You basically just laid out the reasoning for why T-Mac should see at least 20 more targets next year, if not more, which would be a solid increase and put him easily into the Top 10 most targeted WR next season.
×
×
  • Create New...