Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offense and Momentum


Davis83

Recommended Posts

Forgive if already mentioned, but this crap where we start huddling and losing momentum sucks.  1st half, we pretty much ran a no huddle offense and moved the ball at will.  2nd half we're in the huddle every play and having to take TO's cause the play is late.  I know they are trying to eat the clock, but you can accomplish that in the no huddle too.  My god man, when the other team starts scoring, you have to let Cam do his thing and score some points too.  31 in a half - zip in the 2nd...sometimes we look like we are playing Fox ball again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I get the complaint, but the way things were going in the second half I can't feel too good about any strategy that potentially leaves more time on the clock.

Who says there would be more time though? More first downs and longer drives take time as well, and it would be irrelevant with more points on the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Who says there would be more time though? More first downs and longer drives take time as well, and it would be irrelevant with more points on the board.

And what if you don't?  Then what happens to your defense?

Heck, even if you do, your defense doesn't get much rest at a time when it looked like they needed it badly.  On the flipside, a slow sustained drive not only rests your defense, but wears on theirs.

It's basically the Chip Kelly approach, but remember Kelly wore his own defense out as much as he did the other team's.

Again, I understand the idea.  I just can't get behind it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I get the complaint, but the way things were going in the second half I can't feel too good about any strategy that potentially leaves more time on the clock.

Agree we needed to eat the clock up. Worse things the Panthers could have done is risk turning the ball over.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I get the complaint, but the way things were going in the second half I can't feel too good about any strategy that potentially leaves more time on the clock.

The Panthers run more time off the clock when they allow Cam to go no huddle and make adjustments at the line. Look at the drives. I would expect the coaches to know that. Not to mention Cam is more effective out of the no huddle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The announcer pointed out how when you slow play it disrupts the flow of the offense, and it was completely true in our case. How many timeouts did Cam have to waste not to get a delay of game? 

 

The second half was so frustrating, we were running on 1st and 2nd and hoping Cam can save us on third and long. Not only the offense but the defense went to a complete soft coverage. McClain and Finnegan were getting abused 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no excuse to slow the reins on your offense when it just dropped 31 in the first half.  NONE.   This defense has holes, when one is exploited you need points on the board to take the brunt of the damage.   We have the MVP on our team and we handcuffed him for half the game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

And what if you don't?  Then what happens to your defense?

Heck, even if you do, your defense doesn't get much rest at a time when it looked like they needed it badly.  On the flipside, a slow sustained drive not only rests your defense, but wears on theirs.

It's basically the Chip Kelly approach, but remember Kelly wore his own defense out as much as he did the other team's.

Again, I understand the idea.  I just can't get behind it.

Not necessarily. The Chip Kelly approach is to run the play as fast as possible. We could run the no huddle and have Cam sit there at the line reading the D and then not snapping it until the play clock is low and time is still running off. No huddle doesn't mean faster plays. Getting to the LoS faster is what's important in my opinion. I'm honestly not too upset about the second half. Of course we need to make adjustments and the defense sucked but as far as coaching goes I think they did well. We controlled the ball for 16 minutes in the 2nd half despite not scoring and only allowed Seattle to have 5 drives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

And what if you don't?  Then what happens to your defense?

Heck, even if you do, your defense doesn't get much rest at a time when it looked like they needed it badly.  On the flipside, a slow sustained drive not only rests your defense, but wears on theirs.

It's basically the Chip Kelly approach, but remember Kelly wore his own defense out as much as he did the other team's.

Again, I understand the idea.  I just can't get behind it.

They couldn't stop it in the first half, when Carolina had a huge advantage in TOP, so why decide to stop yourself in the second? I'm not saying go full Chip Kelly, but there's no reason to go into a shell in the third and completely disregard an offensive plan that already scored 24 points. My issue is that they only generated one 'slow, sustained drive' that ate any significant time, and a faster pace on an earlier drive may have taken MORE time by going farther and even gotten points. 

Like I said before, if they even get 3 points (or ideally 7 -14) in the third then this conversation isn't happening. Either way though, I'm very happy the team won. Don't want to lose sight of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...