Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I Miss Shaq Thompson

mpugh6

By mpugh6,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

mpugh6 Newbie

mpugh6

Posted
Posted

Disclaimer: this is not a "The sky is falling!" thread. I would just like to discuss our first round draft pick. This team is in the NFCCG and the coaches are obviously doing a lot of things right.

When Shaq was drafted, many of us were shocked, appalled, happy...etc. Everyone viewed the pick in a different way. Personally, I trusted Gettleman with the pick, and I still do. Athletic and versatile players like Shaq are a rare breed.

 There is an issue though. When Shaq was picked, we heard Rivera talk about the new different looks and things we would be able to do with the defense. Well so far I have seen Shaq used in only one way, and that is as a 4-3 OLB. Maybe that was the plan all along. But Shaq played only 4 defensive snaps yesterday (according to Jonathan Jones). Seattle used a lot of 3 receiver sets, and Shaq pretty much never plays in those situations. 

Shaq is an incredible athlete, and we have seen the plays he can make when he is given the opportunity. I imagine it must be very frustrating for him to see Seattle gain so many yards in the second half yesterday while he watched on the sideline. I would like to see Shaq get more opportunities, but Finnegan has played ok in the slot, and it is strange to make a change at this point in the postseason.

Should the Panthers try using Shaq instead of Finnegan when facing 3 receiver sets? Or should things stay exactly the same? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stankowalski Newbie

stankowalski

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, pepaw said:

I love Shaq, his ceiling and what he will bring this team for many years to come, but the thought of him trying to cover Fitzgerald horrifies me.

 

I don't know. Fitz is a physical receiver and if Finnegan has to cover him Fitz will abuse him.  Unfortunately I haven't seen enough of Shaq to know how good or bad he would be against any receivers let alone one of the best in the league.  I hate to think that he would do worse than Finnegan though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted

He'd get worked on by any of those Seattle WRs or Cardinals WRs. Love Shaq and what he's shown this year but he's a future pick (TD's replacement) and our 3rd LB for when teams aren't running 3 wideout sets, which unfortunately is not a lot because of how the league has become so pass-orientated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mage Grand Master

Mage

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, stankowalski said:

I don't know. Fitz is a physical receiver and if Finnegan has to cover him Fitz will abuse him.  Unfortunately I haven't seen enough of Shaq to know how good or bad he would be against any receivers let alone one of the best in the league.  I hate to think that he would do worse than Finnegan though.

Fitz would abuse Shaq.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

Shay was drafted to replace Davis in the near future and maintain our freak LB play as he and Luke would be the guys going forward.

so until that day comes, we won't see tons of Shaq unless we are playing Kansas City or a team that allows us to play real 4-3 D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bartin Collaborator

Bartin

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I understand there are people who would like to see Shaq covering Fitz, I'm just surprised to see any of them on a Panthers forum.  I suspect a Cardinals forum would be full of them.

I wouldn't be opposed to trying it if Finnegan is getting abused physically by Fitz, but going into the game with the plan that a rookie OLB is going to cover a future HoF WR would be idiotic. I think Harper or Coleman would be a better option as a slot CB on Fitz with Boston playing safety if Cortland fails though

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stankowalski Newbie

stankowalski

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I understand there are people who would like to see Shaq covering Fitz, I'm just surprised to see any of them on a Panthers forum.  I suspect a Cardinals forum would be full of them.

Well when he was drafted there were talks of how good he would be in the big nickel package  And if he were really going to be used in that package then he'd be covering slot receivers as well as tight ends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted

I expect Rivera and McDermott to come up with a plan to account for the Cardinals moving Fitz around to find favorable matchups.  He has primarily played in the slot this year and that's where we're weak.  Stick with our base and see how Finnegan does, but we have to have a backup plan if he's struggling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DeAngelo Beason
      I’m expecting a breakout season from Ja'tavion Sanders

      By DeAngelo Beason · Posted

      I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • MHS831
      Morgan & Canales

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Navy_football
      An honest look at Bryce Young

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...