Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why did we go for 2?


t96

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Kuhndog94 said:

41-15 = 26 Pts. So 3 TDs(3 2-PAT) = 24 + 1 FG = 27 which puts it at 42-41. 

Go for two and we're up 27 Pts. They would need a minimum of 5 possessions to beat us instead of 4.

Go for 2 and miss would've made it a 25 point game.

Go for 1 and make it would've made it a 26 point game.

Go fro 2 and make it would've made it a 27 point game.

 

ALL of them are 4 score games, with less than 6 minutes left. This was more of a statement or practice as suggested than something to keep the lead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

Go for 2 and miss would've made it a 25 point game.

Go for 1 and make it would've made it a 26 point game.

Go fro 2 and make it would've made it a 27 point game.

 

ALL of them are 4 score games, with less than 6 minutes left. This was more of a statement or practice as suggested than something to keep the lead.

Yeah, its a 4 score game. But they could but us with 4 possessions. The best they could do is tie us with 4 possessions after going for two.

Edit: Assuming they kick a FG. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Correct this logic I might if it meant taking his guaranteed money now and spread it over 3 years (2026-2028) and maybe add $6m.  I am not sure you can do that, or that he would do it, but it would be a way for him to extend his career and bank accounts and we would be getting him for $6m for 2 years (if healthy), basically, since his entire salary is guaranteed now.  If not, we lose an additional $6m spread over 2 years.  So let's say his guaranteed $$ for 2026 is $18m.  Give him a $24m contract ($8m per) through 2028.  Worst case:  We get $10m in cap relief now and create $3m dead cap for 2 years (2027-8).   Best case?  We get cap relief now and a good/decent guard/tackle for 2 years (2027-2028) and the total salary per year when he is active would be $12m if you don't count any money for the season he cannot play.  That is a good value, and we'd basically be getting a 50% discount rate.  Since we have so much guaranteed now, extending him is not as crazy as it seems.   Something has to be wrong with this logic...      
    • I don't disagree about Nikishin's potential availability, but Hamilton as a replacement? Not an upgrade in my book.
×
×
  • Create New...