Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Moooooooose speaks on The Evolution of Cam Newton


tiger7_88

Recommended Posts

I love the interview with Moose.It totally supports what I have been saying which that Cam was widely criticized when he came into this league.  He was not considered worth the number 1 pick by many. It has to be gratifying to watch everyone change their tune and have to eat crow. Cam is going to crown this season with a win in the Super Bowl and do in the NFL what he did in college. Win it al and take a decent offense and make them great. Will his team to victory with his athleticism and leadership. People who argue that Cam was the consensus pick in the draft need to hear Moose tell it like it was. The way I remember it  too, and not some revisionist history. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I watched that I was thinking to myself, Why dont they have smart people like Moose on ESPN? He is an analyst. I hope he gets a lot more air time because he was spot on with everything he said including the part about being one of the only ones to put his word down on Cam.

 

I remember him arguing with Frank Garcia, Frank saying he didnt think Cam was gonna do anything in this league. In fact, pretty much all of WFNZ made a point to try and get as many doubters on the air as possible to stir up controversy. If they hadnt done that then maybe Cam would do more interviews with them.

 

Man they lost a lot of air time and marketing dollars by screwing that up. A couple of big interviews with Cam would get huge air time right now. Thats their system though, Chip Kelly style. WFNZ thinks its ok to just commit to being douchebags.

 

Moose decided to never start that show with Frank because thats what the WFNZ guys are all about. They wont inform you about how the offense works are give you details about the teams intricacies. Just that there was a disagreement or a fight or someone said we suck.

lol, Breaking Loose with Frank but woops no Moose. It couldve been awesome and the ratings couldve been huge. . . but WFNZ went with "Lets continue to be trolls".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, panthers55 said:

I love the interview with Moose.It totally supports what I have been saying which that Cam was widely criticized when he came into this league.  He was not considered worth the number 1 pick by many. It has to be gratifying to watch everyone change their tune and have to eat crow. Cam is going to crown this season with a win in the Super Bowl and do in the NFL what he did in college. Win it al and take a decent offense and make them great. Will his team to victory with his athleticism and leadership. People who argue that Cam was the consensus pick in the draft need to hear Moose tell it like it was. The way I remember it  too, and not some revisionist history. 

Good to know I"m still in your head, on your mind. 

Take a listen to this audio from 12:40-14:50.

From 12:40 it illustrates your thinking somewhat (Doug Farrar felt Cam would go #1 in Feb of 2011, then Gabbert signs with CAA, so there's a big media push with Gabbert, and Farrar thinks Gabbert may go #1 over Newton). Of course, you didn't think Newton would ever go #2 as far deep as Feb 2011 in the first place (hehe)....We get that. 

Don't worry. All the Nolan Nolan Nawrocki, Running QB, Character issue's stuff's brought up as well. You know, the stuff you believed why 'many thought he was such an awful pick', such as the guys on WFNZ, Charlotte and in the media. LOL

From 14:20: The record is set straight regarding Cam and NFL people vs stereotypes and what's was said in the media. The writer specifically addresses, and debunks what you're saying here. And he was a believer, contributor of it somewhat; as you will see.

This takes place Feb 2011 as well, loooooooong before the draft (and 2015-16).

I will not quote the dialogue, cause I wanna make sure/see if you listened.

So please lets end the subject, and veiled passive aggressive outburst once and for all. We'll just agree to disagree, unless you have some sort of an agenda.

Ironically, your last contention was regarding Cam's rookie year (and how he couldn't throw, read defenses, and just wasn't that good a Rookie). So you lost that one, now you continue to expand things, and move the goal post where you feel you have more support.

BTW: Stay focused and please listen to that audio from 12:40-14:50 with a cogent, thoughtful response, if you do.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is just Panthers history pain speaking.
    • From what I gather, sure it allows you more room in that you can manipulate the cap more due to smaller prorated amounts to fit salaries in, but for cap purposes, you're still on the hook for the money at the end of the day.    "ChatGPT You said: What are the advantages for NFL teams to sign larger signing bonuses? ChatGPT said: NFL teams often use large signing bonuses as a strategic tool in contracts. While they cost real cash up front, they offer several advantages, especially when it comes to salary cap management, player retention, and negotiation leverage. Here's a breakdown of the benefits: ✅ 1. Salary Cap Flexibility Signing bonuses are prorated over the life of the contract (up to 5 years) for salary cap purposes. This allows teams to spread out the cap hit, even if the player receives the money immediately. Example: A $20M signing bonus on a 4-year deal counts only $5M/year against the cap. ✅ 2. Attracting Top Talent Players love signing bonuses because they're guaranteed money paid up front. Offering a bigger signing bonus can sweeten the deal without inflating yearly salaries. ✅ 3. Front-Loading Real Cash, Not Cap Teams with strong cash flow can pay big bonuses now while minimizing the immediate cap hit. Useful for teams trying to build around rookie QB contracts or with flexible cash budgets. ✅ 4. Locking in Key Players Larger bonuses make it harder for a player to be released early due to dead cap consequences. This can create more job security for the player and roster continuity for the team. ✅ 5. Leverage in Restructures Big signing bonuses create future cap hits via proration. Teams can later restructure deals (e.g., convert salary to bonus) to create even more cap space. ✅ 6. Competitive Edge In free agency, a team offering more guaranteed cash up front often wins the bidding war, even if the total contract value is lower than another team's. ⚠️ Key Caveat: Large signing bonuses increase dead cap risk if the player is cut or traded early."   I think that roster bonuses can be a useful tool if you're trying to keep players in by manipulating numbers and spreading the hit over time, but I don't think that it's something that you want to use unless it's "necessary." I don't know that you want to get into signing rookies on roster bonuses, as the bust rate is relatively high.    
    • not even if that team in New Orleans disbands before the first game.  Saw one 2026 mock that had them drafting first next year.  
×
×
  • Create New...