Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Josh Norman tips off our coverages presnap


CRA

Recommended Posts

It appears nearly 100% of time Norman shows presnap if we are in man vs zone.  If it a real or disguised look.

http://mweb.cbssports.com/nfl/writer/pat-kirwan/25472072/after-further-review-in-super-bowl-poker-game-josh-norman-has-a-tell

Wow.  Peyton may suck but you can't make the game that easy when no look can be disguised.  His brother if I recall got him good too...so you know Peyton this one way or another

If Pete Prisco figures it out...you would like to think our coaches would have.

Having a tell ultimately did NE in. That is worrisome 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A defensive tell isn't even close to the same advantage as a center basically telling you when he is snapping the ball to his QB. 18 games into the season and I don't think it has been a problem so far this year, I can't imagine other coaches and QB's didn't notice it, knowing we're in press man doesn't automatically mean open receivers, they still have to beat the press coverage and catch the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, joemac said:

Like someone else said, it is very easy to tell if a D is in man or zone...just put a WR in motion. If the CB checking big him follows - Man, if he stays put - zone. Not exactly earthshattering info there...

It's the NFL...the have a man take an obvious 5 steps in motion can be disguised as well.  Coaches wouldn't bother working on elaborate disguises if the simplistic motion man always tipped it off IMO.  Probably does some but not always.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, joemac said:

Like someone else said, it is very easy to tell if a D is in man or zone...just put a WR in motion. If the CB checking big him follows - Man, if he stays put - zone. Not exactly earthshattering info there...

It is if your name is Pete Prisco.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...