Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Shula is in full control of the offense


Growl

Recommended Posts

Just now, tiger7_88 said:

He had done a great job really.

Then, when it really counted, he and Ron decided what was REALLY needed wasn't what Cam could provide them, but the good ol' TOP battle they love so dearly!

You do know we won the dearly treasured and beloved Time Of Possession Super Bowl Championship tonight, don't you?  And isn't that what's really important?

When it was all on the line, Shula took it out of Cams hands and Rivera allowed it. Rivera allowing it is the biggest shock to me after all the change Rivera himself had made this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, csx said:

The players lost this game without a doubt. If you are watching this game it is obvious.

The players on offense played VERY poorly.

The fact that the Denver defense knew everything that was coming pretty much every damn play didn't help them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SZ James (banned) said:

So is no coach culpable when we lose because of their unit? I guess we should retain everyone forever then and keep drafting and hiring more all pros

He is culpable for not calling great plays. The players are more culpable for playing like sh*t. It is very hard to turn sh*t into a diamond.

1 minute ago, KillerKat said:

We were in position to score multiple times if we didn't throw away downs. Again, where are the short passing plays to counter the pressure Denver was bringing? Exactly, there was none, except for a 3rd down crossing patter to Cotchery. 

He should have called more slants. Our receivers shouldn't have dropped eight passes. That's eight lost downs. 

1 minute ago, KillerKat said:

We could have overcome our mistakes. Shula was too incompetent to do so.

Please give your magic gameplan. Can we throw? Not really. Our receivers dropped everything, and Cam had no time to throw. How about run? Well, we have no room, the option didn't work, and our backs fumbled twice. 

I'll give you two substantial things we could have done to change the game.

1) Gano makes the field goal. That's a three point gain.
2) Teddy Williams tackles the returner. The Broncos had no offense outside the first drive. They would not have scored. That's a three point loss.

That means, with five minutes left, we are tied 13-13 instead of down 16-10. That's not even factoring in the red zone issues. This was a team loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rodeo said:

Those runs up the middle constantly were downright embarrassing.

you know how you to yourself "how did this man even get this far" sometimes, and it's largely just hyperbole.

 

i actually wondered how somebody with such a small and limited football IQ could make it this far

 

obvious his last name is the answer to that question, like how could you be so dense. it's baffling. i literally cannot find the words to describe what i watched tonight

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TN05 said:

He is culpable for not calling great plays. The players are more culpable for playing like sh*t. It is very hard to turn sh*t into a diamond.

He should have called more slants. Our receivers shouldn't have dropped eight passes. That's eight lost downs. 

Please give your magic gameplan. Can we throw? Not really. Our receivers dropped everything, and Cam had no time to throw. How about run? Well, we have no room, the option didn't work, and our backs fumbled twice. 

I'll give you two substantial things we could have done to change the game.

1) Gano makes the field goal. That's a three point gain.
2) Teddy Williams tackles the returner. The Broncos had no offense outside the first drive. They would not have scored. That's a three point loss.

That means, with five minutes left, we are tied 13-13 instead of down 16-10. That's not even factoring in the red zone issues. This was a team loss.

How about a fuging play that isn't 50 yards down the field? Why didn't we call short passes to help Cam out? Why is this the third time I'm asking you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

idk how you blame shula, wr's drop numerous balls that would have got us within the 10 yard line, not to mention tolbert giving the ball to the broncos....panthers did exactly what they need to to lose, implode 

You blame Shula because you are mad we lost and want a scapegoat. Really that simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right...I think they've done really well. No one's going to bat 1000% but they've addressed areas of need and there's no comparison to the overall talent of the team now than when DC and then Morgan got the reigns. This whole season is about seeing how much of a step up can Bryce and this team make. If Bryce can't and last year is as good as it gets for him then at least we have a talented roster for the next guy. I think we're going to be good this season 
    • I said could, not would. I recognize he has potential based on past performance. Compared to what KP has done, Howell has more potential and the physical traits to make noise. KP has small hands and a weak arm. Not something you want in even your backup QB.  I've been hammering since last off-season before we re-signed Dalton, improve the room. Other than getting younger, I don't see how anyone can say we legitimately improved the room or even tried. We might as well have signed Josh Rosen.  Dalton is still on the roster for now. That's 3 QBs unless we trade or cut him. He's still Bryce's mentor after all. Do you believe we are going to draft someone with potential and give them a legitimate opportunity to develop from the practice squad? Are we going to carry 3 QBs on the active roster? 4 for a developmental rookie? Are we going to potentially cut KP if we draft a rookie and he's outperformed? Doubtful. Cutting Dalton(if we can't trade him) and KP would be 8m in wasted cap space.  I chose Howell as an example because he showed promise in his only full season as a starter. You could plug in another name with the physical traits and potential and what i said would still apply. KP showed almost nothing and was benched. I genuinely don't care if it’s rookie pick as long as there is the potential to develop into a future NFL QB.  As much as I can't stand him, Bellichek was always developing a number 2 QB even with the GOAT as his starter. The wisdom of that was evident when Cassell came in when Brady was hurt week 1 and went 11-5 and almost made the wildcard, which 11-5 gets you almost any other year. I give credit where it's due though. Cassel and Jimmy G both came into the league as developmental QBs, potential QB1s, and went on to have careers.  You never know if you never try. KP feels like a punt in addressing the most important position on the field. Bryce has never played 2 full games of franchise QB level football back to back.  If Bryce progresses, are you ready to offer a 280m 5 year extension based off a one hit wonder year? If Bryce regresses and we need a QB in 27, are we going to trade a fortune away again to trade up to 1 to get one? Are you ready to do the past 3 years all over again?  To me, it's not about Kenny Pickett. It's about the move itself. It was a feeble attempt to improve the QB room. We better hope Bryce succeeds, because if he doesn't, we literally have no backup plan right now.   
    • IOL that early isn’t good value at all. We have a LT who might not ever be good again and a RT that might retire soon. T seems deep early in this draft, so I’d go there in the 1st. 
×
×
  • Create New...