Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stop blaming the refs, we played like poo


FuFuLamePoo

Recommended Posts

Just now, gettlolman said:

Nippleshorts fuged us with this poo OL he produced. People would have been happier if we didn't fluke our way to the Super Bowl only for him to get exposed. That way they could have held on to the idea the Nippleshorts is a genius. But he's clearly a clown.

gtfo troll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don't think the refs had any effect on the game, you're fuging delusional. The game changed on the Cotchery no-catch. Denver was allowed to play balls to the wall after that. 

Denver has 0 2nd half penalties, we have 8. Two of those were for 30 yards and one of those was enough to give Denver a first down and a touchdown. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The blame doesn't fall entirely on the refs, but they had a big hand in it. Denver's first td never should have happened and only did after 2 blown calls. They called exactly 0 flags on Denver the entire second half, even during clear pass interference.

The Panthers' offense got beat, absolutely. But the game would have been closer with better officiating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ruff said:

If you don't think the refs had any effect on the game, you're fuging delusional. The game changed on the Cotchery no-catch. Denver was allowed to play balls to the wall after that. 

Denver has 0 2nd half penalties, we have 8. Two of those were for 30 yards and one of those was enough to give Denver a first down and a touchdown. 

If you think that the play of our offense was acceptable, regardless of the refs,  then you are delusional. 

Oh, and Denver's defense gets credit also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I said that way back because it is true. Teams aren’t trading what appears to be a can’t miss prospect.    In an extremely rare scenario like they have an established QB and maybe got the pick in a trade. Sort of like the Bears but with a better incumbent. If they’s have had someone significantly better than Fields they might have cashed in. 
    • So you're saying you'd still go back and take the inferior talents, just because you think they fit with Bryce better, a player who is more likely than not, to no longer be a Panther next year? That's just crazy to say, wanting to have a worse player because you think they fit better with your awful QB is just dumb.  You take the best players, if your existing players then aren't good enough, you replace them later. It's crazy that there are still people with this take after they've seen what T-Mac can do for us in just 5 games so far.
    • I have seen Bryce make some outstanding throws but what he is up against is even when the WRs get a little separation, that tightens up while the ball is in the air. By degrees depending on the distance. Not as critical on the short stuff. 
×
×
  • Create New...