Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Josh Norman Contract talks have stalled, bruh is getting the franchise tag.


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

I seriously hope Standard isn't serious with those posts.  Coleman was a good pickup, and had a lot of ints, but he also was out of position a lot.

I really think people are dismissing a top CB far too quick.   The ability to take a QB's #1 option away most of the time is invaluable.  

I don't blame Josh for wanting all he can get.  He could play the first play of the year and get hurt and never play again.   The Panthers had their chance to sign him before last season and they didn't offer enough.  Norman bet on himself and proved that he is, who he thinks he is.

And seriously questioning this guy in the locker room?  Did you see the videos of Norman being more upset about losing the SB than anyone else?  Just stop.

1st off, half the time, Norman didn't even cover the opposition's #1. He played his side of the field and if that guy was their #1, then that's who he guarded.

Secondly, anyone who knows anything about this team realizes how much help he got from TD, Luke and Star/Short...so it's not like he's out on an island like we see from Revis and Patterson. 

Hes not top-5 and I know this because of the statements I made in the previous paragraph. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Because it's as pathetic as a shameless guy begging to his ex to take him back. Josh is gone. He wants money. Carolina doesn't have it. Why prolong the inevitable? Get compensation for him now while his stock is at an all-time high.

Negotiating a contract is like begging an ex to take you back? What the what? Of course he wants money. So does every player in the NFL. Carolina does have the money to pay him. It is just a matter of coming to terms that both sides agree on. Ya know, kind like negotiating. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Peppers90 NC said:

As a team, we scored the most points. That is different than having the #1 offense.

Carolina was the best and most balanced offense in the league. Name a better offensive team and quit putting asterisks that move.the bar around to try and prove your argument.

most of our games were basically over by halftime and that's the reason why we'd give up so many scores late in the game...it was because we had huge leads and our guys just got to half-ass for good portions of the game, offense included.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheNewStandard said:

1st off, half the time, Norman didn't even cover the opposition's #1. He played his side of the field and if that guy was their #1, then that's who he guarded.

Secondly, anyone who knows anything about this team realizes how much help he got from TD, Luke and Star/Short...so it's not like he's out on an island like we see from Revis and Patterson. 

Hes not top-5 and I know this because of the statements I made in the previous paragraph. 

He played the best receiver on the outside. He moved to the side of the #1 and if they moved to the slot, he stayed on the outside. And after 4 interceptions and multiple touchdowns, they stopped throwing at him so much. That is called shutting down half the field. Of course he got help from his teammates. That is why they are teammates. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Promethean Forerunner said:

We do have money but you know damn well Josh wants to be paid like a QB. Not. Gonna. Happen. If the rumors are true of him rejecting 7-10 million, then yeah, ship his ass away. Gettleman isn't going to break the bank for a DB. I love Norman but he has to realize he has it really, really good in Carolina. He's on a team with a franchise QB who just recently won league MVP and plays behind the best LBs and DTs in the game today.

 

Paying him 13-14 million average salary is not too much what he does. We can just agree to disagree, but turning down 7 million before last year has nothing to do with this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, TheNewStandard said:

1st off, half the time, Norman didn't even cover the opposition's #1. He played his side of the field and if that guy was their #1, then that's who he guarded.

Secondly, anyone who knows anything about this team realizes how much help he got from TD, Luke and Star/Short...so it's not like he's out on an island like we see from Revis and Patterson. 

Hes not top-5 and I know this because of the statements I made in the previous paragraph. 

First, nope, you are wrong.  Norman didn't play slot, but he moved to whatever side the #1 was on.  Most CB's don't follow in the slot.  

Second, Short got help from Star, and Short also get help from Norman's coverage, as well as Short helped Norman.  It's a team.  This pass rush wasn't the best this year, a lot of the sacks were coverage sacks, which you can thank to Norman.  Without Norman on this team, we would have gave up a LOT of points, I promise you.   Luke was out three weeks and Norman still played like a monster.   Short/Star and our whole d-line heavily rotate.  I didn't see Josh's play go down when people were rotating in and out.  

So yes, from last year's play, Norman IS a top 5, if you go by the last year.  It's pretty dumb and rude to diminish his play last year because apparently, you just don't like him personally?  (judging by the fact you think he's a problem in the locker room, which he isn't, or a normal scrum with the QB (most QBs don't go down the field) whereas both as friends now and joke about it).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sharkkiller said:

Paying him 13-14 million average salary is not too much what he does. We can just agree to disagree, but turning down 7 million before last year has nothing to do with this year.

No question he is worth that and his performance last year was worth that. The issue is how long will he be worth that. If he regresses in 3 years to an above average CB at age 30 or 31, but is still getting $14M per year with a big dead money hit to cut him then it's a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is something that has irritated me for a while. I'm going to address his play during these "game winning drives," 8 of them apparently, clear up some nomenclature, and address some points specifically. The games in question.  Also responding to this  What is a Game Winning Drive? This is an undefined term and therefore can be whatever the person using it wants it to be. The term itself removes context from a result which lends itself to be used by people arguing in bad faith. Some people like to attribute every time Bryce is on the field in a situation like this to him "winning the game," or just kind of associating him with a "Game Winning Drive" and leaving it open ended. There's no criteria for what a GWD is. If you had a spectrum of what this could encompass it, on one end you'd have a single player being responsible, and on the other you'd have all 11. Put another way, a QB going 9/9 for 99 yards and rushing the final yard himself is on one end of the spectrum, and on the other is the blocking tight end who was just kinda there. Hey, he was on the field too.  For these purposes, I'm going to hedge and say a GWD is something you know when you see it. I'm not going to claim Bryce hasn't had one, but I'm absolutely not going to give him credit for every one of them. Reasonable people can disagree at the margins, but generally I think we'll be in accord more than not. I also want to look at the context of these, because I think we need to keep in mind how the team got to that position. There's a certain "mystique" about the term game winning drive. Like all of a sudden, when the game is on the line, the QB just turns it on and becomes a better player and blah blah blah. Nothing else matters because he Just Wins Games It neatly ignores the circumstances that led to a team needing a last second drive against some of the worst teams in the league, and this should be taken into consideration. This was an argument made in favor of Delhomme for years...until a certain game that we won't mention.  In reality, defenses are tired by the end of the game, defensive coordinators will generally give up yards in exchange for clock, and offensive playcallers will be more aggressive. That's really it.  But Fiz, why now? Why tonight? People are building this narrative about Bryce Young because it allows them to overlook the rest of his performance, his role in getting the team into whatever hole they're trying to crawl out of, and minimizing the contributions of everyone else (or assigning blame to players other than him) to make him look like he's better than he is/being let down. People in the national media with motivations I can only speculate on are doing this and it's irritating. Also it's very slow at work tonight and it's either this or reruns of ER.  I'll be looking at the final drives here (more or less) when the Panthers were in a position to win or tie. I'll also be adding some context as a I go. So lets just look at these.  2023 Houston at Carolina - 5/10 41 yds, FG  The Panthers drove to the Houston 44, then ran it 6 times in a row for the final 12 yards before the Texans started diving offsides. Panthers weren't just killing clock; Bryce had already taken one sack on the drive (six on the day!), and I don't think any of us feel like Pineiro had a 60 yarder in him in 2023. He did have 5 FG in him though, which is all the scoring the Panthers could muster. It was enough.  Game Winning Drive: eh, Bryce didn't really cover himself in glory here. If you think getting the team into range for a 60 yard attempt before letting the RB finish the job is a GWD, then we're going to have some problems. I'm generally kinda dubious of the whole "wow he set up a long range field goal for the win what a legend." Why yes early career Tom Brady was a fraud carried by Adam Vinatieri why do you ask  Atlanta at Carolina - 5/6 53 yds, GW FG Game Winning Drive: yeah, I think so. It was a miserable 9-6 win against the Desmond Ridder led Atlanta Falcons. Prior to this final drive, Bryce was a whopping 13/18 for 114 yds and the offense had managed 6 whole points. Hard for me to say here they weren't in the position to need a GWD because of how ineffective Bryce was. That said, I think it's fair he did this one on his own. Credit where credit's due little guy, you did it.  2024 New Orleans at Carolina - 1/4, 38 yds Game Winning Drive: not really. Panthers win 23-22. Sanders scored from 16 yards out on the ground, Carolina was only there because of a DPI (a theme with Bryce), Bryce took a sack on the 2 point conversion, and then the defense stopped the Saints afterwards. Prior to this Bryce had a very Bryce esque 15/22 133 1 Td 1 Int performance going so he was just kinda there.  Again, this is where context comes into play. Completing 1/4 passes does not "leading a game winning drive" make. If that's the dividing line, everyone on the field led a GWD, so the term becomes meaningless.  Carolina at Giants - 0/0  Game Winning Drive: no matter what a GWD is, it's certainly not this, and if anyone argues differently you can disregard them. Daniel Jones fumbled on the first play of overtime, Panthers ran a couple times and kicked the game winning FG. Prior to this, Bryce was terrible. Panthers were up 17-7 with 5:31 in the 3rd quarter, on the back of Chuba. From that point on, Bryce went 2/6 for 14 yards. Panthers had two 3 and outs and got just 2 first downs. Panthers overcame him here.  Arizona at Carolina - 0/0 Game Winning Drive: no. On the panthers second possession in overtime, Chuba ran it twice for 49 yards and a TD. On their first possession, Bryce completed a 1 yard checkdown, took a sack, and the Panthers punted after totaling -4 yards. Furthermore, Bryce couldn't convert a 3rd and 3 at the 2 minute warning up 3 points. Arizona got the ball back and tied the game.  Carolina at Atlanta - 5/5, 71 yards  Game Winning Drive: sure whatever have a day. For context, it's generally accepted in Atlanta sports media the defense was trying get the coordinator fired that day, which he was. I was at the game. I'm not saying the players had a conspiracy, but I'm not sure how it would look different if they did. but hey, as long as weird poo keeps happening against the Falcons, let it ride.  Miami at Carolina - 3/5, 45 yards, TD  Game Winning Drive: yes BUT. I don't want to re-litigate this. Briefly, the Dolphins have a historically bad defense, the Panthers were only trailing because of how badly Bryce played, the defense bailed the team out, and Rico was clearly the MVP. Trying to sneak this into a narrative about Bryce and his game winning drives is an attempt to hide how completely dogshit he was for most of the game. On second half drives to start, Bryce went.... 0/1 passing, took a sack, FG 2/3 passing, 18 yards, Delay of Game on Bryce, punt 2/2 passing, 16 yards, took a sack, punt  1/3 passing, 4 yards, punt  1/1 passing, 4 yds, 2 defensive penalties, 43 yd run by Rico, 1 yd TD run Absolutely dismal performance Dallas at Carolina - 3/6, 25 yards, FG  Game Winning Drive: Panthers had 34 yards rushing on this drive, and Rico rushed for more yards on the day than Bryce threw. People will want to point to the 7 yard slant to Renfrow, but that's one moment. Why do you need a 4th down conversion to kick a game winning FG against the worst defense in the league? The Renfrow catch is just as meaningful as the DPI (again) on 3rd and 7. Hard for me to say yeah Bryce gets credit for this and Rico doesn't. or Ryan Fitzgerald. People aren't going to be telling stories about where they were when Bryce got 25 yards passing to set up a 30 yard FG to beat the worst defense in the league.  Conclusion I'd say low end 3, high end 6 for what I'd actually credit Bryce for with having a game winning drive. Absolutely not for the Giants and Cardinals game. Saints game probably not.  As far as questioning which games need a GWD because of Bryce, I'd argue Miami, New York, 2023 Atlanta, and Houston definitely. League average QB play and you don't need the heroics. Bryce had multiple chances to seal the game against the Cardinals in 2024 and couldn't do it. The defense picked off the Cardinals late in the 4th quarter at their 11 yard line after the Panthers went 3 and out, including a classic Bryce check down short of the line to gain on 3rd.  About half of the time, it looks like these GWD, whomever is responsible for them, are happening in part because of what Bryce did or didn't do. I don't think league average QB play is too much to ask for. Panthers usually win these games despite of Bryce; he's an obstacle to be overcome.  Stats Taken in totality, in these situations Bryce's stats are  7 games 17/26 passing for 233, 1 TD  65% completion rating  13 ypc 8.9 ypa I'm not going to compare this to league average, I'm just going to point out you'd expect someone with 8 GWD to have more than 1 TD.  Other side of this  but what about the games in a similar situation where they DIDN'T win? Shouldn't we look at those games too? Maybe find ones where Bryce absolutely lost the game with a pick, or calling an audible into the wrong play, or spiking the ball with zero seconds on the clock after throwing into the middle of the field, or all of the turnover on downs? Maybe also go into some of the games that have been mythologized, like the Eagles game that ended on a turnover on downs where Bryce had 3rd and 4 in Eagles territory and couldn't get a first down? Yeah...someone should do that...
    • Best RB tandem in Panther history (at least for a few weeks)
×
×
  • Create New...