Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BJ Raji


firefox1234

Recommended Posts

Panthers have "some interest" in former Packers DT BJ Raji according to ESPN

 

Would love if Gman picked him up, i know he is typically a 3-4 DT but imagine him and Short paired together! Also a good stop gap safety net if the Panthers arent able to keep both Star and Short.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

We need a guy that will do a dance on the D-line after a sack. I'm in.

0.5 sacks in the last 4 years combined(missed all of 2014 with injury so 3 seasons total). I wouldn't get your hopes up for much dancing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bartin said:

0.5 sacks in the last 4 years combined(missed all of 2014 with injury so 3 seasons total). I wouldn't get your hopes up for much dancing.

I didn't say he would be the one doing the actual sacking...just the shaking and baking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fox007 said:

So you're saying he should come on the cheap?

That's not really his game. Raji, Soliai, and Love all fit the 1-tech mold in a 4-3, so they'd be expected to be the second-unit Star where they're mainly run-stuffers. He's not gonna break the bank, but I'm not sure I can see Gettleman paying him what he wants either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just wondering about possible draft implications. I'm also wondering what it means in reference to Coples playing for us. Does this squash that dream, or does it mean that they are actually considering Coples at DE (and not DT, as some suspected)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First off, my memory is faulty and so I should remember you. Anyways, welcome back. Having been around here since 2004/2005, I do have to say all these hot takes are not necessary new. I still very much remember all the constant complaints about Jake Delhomme. How he was too inaccurate, fumbled the ball too often, threw bad interceptions, and how Steve Smith deserved a better QB. How this franchise needed to replace Jake for someone better because he dragged everyone down. We even had names for Jake defenders; Blind Delhomme Jock Sniffers (BDJS). That one thread about Chris Weinke over Jake Delhomme because Weinke threw for 423 Yards but only scoring 13 points remains the worst hot takes I've ever seen around here. So to me, it feels like history repeating itself again and I don't feel like getting that much involved in flame wars like I used to. I am more of a sit back and see what the players/team does type of person. And even then, yes, there are so many moving parts that it's not as easy to pinpoint the core issues, especially when you're not inside the building and know every single detail.  And yes, I think even way back then, I hated how overvalued the QB position was and it hasn't gotten much better. It's to where my philosophy has shifted to where if you can't win a SB with a QB on their rookie contract, you might as well get another one. Otherwise, you have to give that QB so much money that the rest of the roster suffers and your window becomes quite narrow.  That's why I'm skeptical that Mahomes/Burrow/Jackson/Allen will win more than one or two SB's between them. None of them look as invisible as they did a few years ago and that's because their targets are much inferior and/or they are getting more roughed up behind a worse O-line.
    • Haha I was still off was thinking of mac jones he has done extremely well this year with basically no weopons as all the 49ers are hurt except for mcaffrey but he is playing slow this year for some reason. 
×
×
  • Create New...