Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Positions need a Vet answer for us right now??


WOW!!

Recommended Posts

Gettleman's stated strategy is to fill out the roster in free agency to set him self up so there aren't any true needs in the draft. Needs meaning we actually don't even have enough players at the position rather than the traditional meaning of a position that needs to be upgraded. So any position we lost a player will get filled by a vet replacement.

DE - lost Allen

SS - lost Harper

CB - lost Finnegan/Tillman

3T DT - lost Edwards

OT - lost Chandler

OG - losing Amini

1T DT - Love has not re-signed so if he leaves then we will get someone else at this position

OC - lost Velasco, but already replaced by Gradkowski

WR - lost Cotchery but replaced by Benjamin and Hills return so no movement here

I would suspect that we will make at least 5 and up to 7 signings to fill out the roster at the aforementioned positions prior to the draft except C and WR which have already been filled. OT and OG could be filled by a single player. A fair number of those probably won't even make the 53 man roster similar to guys like Trusnik, Todman and Boykin from last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, sharkkiller said:

I have learned that it is better for me just to sit back and let Gettleman work, than to try and guess what he is doing and fret on it. I will be relaxed, and watch it unfold.

What's the fun in that??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MadHatter said:

I agree with DE.  We have Ealy and CJ.....and then a bunch of unproven situation guys.  We would be one injury away from trouble at DE. 

Didn't Horton start something like 15 games in 2014 when we suddenly lost Hardy?  Not saying he's the answer, but Horton & Addison aren't really unproven.  But at this point they're still rotational guys, not starters. 

I assume we'll add a high round DE pick if at all possible in the draft.

My higher priority for vet signings is for a DT since we currently have 2 vacancies.  Then Nickel Back.  Maybe a Safety.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bartin said:

Gettleman's stated strategy is to fill out the roster in free agency to set him self up so there aren't any true needs in the draft. Needs meaning we actually don't even have enough players at the position rather than the traditional meaning of a position that needs to be upgraded. So any position we lost a player will get filled by a vet replacement.

DE - lost Allen

SS - lost Harper

CB - lost Finnegan/Tillman

3T DT - lost Edwards

OT - lost Chandler

OG - losing Amini

1T DT - Love has not re-signed so if he leaves then we will get someone else at this position

OC - lost Velasco, but already replaced by Gradkowski

WR - lost Cotchery but replaced by Benjamin and Hills return so no movement here

I would suspect that we will make at least 5 and up to 7 signings to fill out the roster at the aforementioned positions prior to the draft except C and WR which have already been filled. OT and OG could be filled by a single player. A fair number of those probably won't even make the 53 man roster similar to guys like Trusnik, Todman and Boykin from last year.

Nice post.

Just to add to your list

P - lost Nortman, but already signed Swayze Waters.   I assume though that we'll add another punter for competition either via the draft, UDFA or possibly a FA.  I have no idea if there are any other decent punters on the market.  Assume we'll wait until after the draft for any signing if needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MadHatter said:

I agree with DE.  We have Ealy and CJ.....and then a bunch of unproven situation guys.  We would be one injury away from trouble at DE. 

I agree. We need to improve our pass rush; an injury-and that has been CJ's MO of late, would be catastrophic.  Heck, to assume that Addison, Ealy, and CJ can give us the pressure this D needs is ambitious thinking.   As we all know, it takes time for an elite talent to develop into a pro 43 DE.   Even first rounders will take time--we have a shot now--lets bring in a talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You honestly think Tampa would have traded down with a division rival so their rival could land a “generational player” at a massive position of need for TB?   bruh
    • Ya'll better quit throwing shots at Zod. He'll come in here and ban everybody. I had a friend @prosource who was banned in 2015 because he said some very minor things about Zod being an ass to the posters on the main forum after starting the All-Pro one. He said he felt like another level is cool, but don't punch down on people that don't want All-Pro. (He did say that it wasn't going to last long anyways.🤔) I distinctly remember him calling and being like "dude, I got banned, my profile says I don't have access to the Huddle!") I feel like once Tepper came in and cut off all unofficial access to the team, Zod was going to be around less. The All-Pro board had really good photos, even in game stuff, and I remember seeing him behind a little fenced in area at Wofford for non team sanctioned press/photographers after Tepper bought the team. I knew then his ego wouldn't allow him to continue with past fervency and effort with that reduction in access. Dude was literally in the locker room when JR was owner.  I came over in 2011 immediately after finding out this place existed. I was super involved with the Charlotte forum, and fell off after its demise. I will never forget arguing Pep over Ryan Sims on that forum! Who is Ryan Sims some of you may ask? My answer is exactly!
    • And not see him running free. Because has been free a lot more than he gets credit for.    Now what XL does with that when he does see the ball, is on him. 
×
×
  • Create New...