Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This tweet got me feeling all warm and tingly inside


Gazi

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Jase said:

drew brees could help the saints by taking a paycut, but he's got to make that $30 million, though

The beauty of this is that, because it's dead money, even a paycut won't recover any of it. He'd have to physically pay back some of his signing bonus in order for them to get any of that back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 2016:

 

For $60 mil the Saints are paying for Drew Brees and dead cap space.

For little under $60 mil the Panthers are paying for Cam Newton, Josh Norman, Ryan Kalil, Thomas davis, Luke Kuechly, Kwann Short, and Kony Ealy according to overthecap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Wyank said:

In 2016:

 

For $60 mil the Saints are paying for Drew Brees and dead cap space.

For little under $60 mil the Panthers are paying for Cam Newton, Josh Norman, Ryan Kalil, Thomas davis, Luke Kuechly, Kwann Short, and Kony Ealy according to overthecap.

HA! I wish I could like this twice! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wyank said:

In 2016:

 

For $60 mil the Saints are paying for Drew Brees and dead cap space.

For little under $60 mil the Panthers are paying for Cam Newton, Josh Norman, Ryan Kalil, Thomas davis, Luke Kuechly, Kwann Short, and Kony Ealy according to overthecap.

Gettleman! Y U So Savage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...