Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Plain vs Peanut M&Ms


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, 15 said:

Pretzel and it's not even close. Like this shouldn't even be a question.

I've never eaten plaster but I imagine plaster would taste like pretzel M&Ms

Mostly fug M&Ms because Kyle Busch but if I gotta pick it's peanut butter M&Ms first, though the mint kind seems enticing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Panthro said:

My family makes Gorp...besides wanting to murder the person in charge of adding the raisins every year I cannot eat a plain m&m without accompanying it with a nut.

Peanut m&ms are the best. 

Gorp would be the only thing I'd eat for breakfast, lunch and dinner if not for the stupid ass raisins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, caatfan said:

Do you get to keep the goat, or just an hour of its time?

No, no, no.  The goat had things to do, people to see, places to go.  There is no delaying a goat in Bahrain.

 

In Saudi Arabia, Allah sees all, Allah is all. 

 

Allah does not see what happens in Bahrain.

 

Goats are no exception.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, frash.exe said:

Peanut all the way

 

only downside is there always happens to be that one off tasting peanut m&m in the bag. Fug that one.

I have the same problem when I eat pistachios, which are some of my favorite nuts to put in my mouth. You can enjoy several flavorful bites, but then you get one that is fugged up and it almost ruins your appetite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • In fairness to Christie, they were out of deep- fried Snickers bars. 
  • This way, he can say he only had a small, 3oz bag of M&Ms. 
  • Christie thinks Slim Jims are a diet food. 

(I forgot the question, obviously, but I am rolling with a sequence of pretty bad jokes)

  • M & Ms melt in his mouth but not in Trump's small hands.
  • As a child, Chris did not know Cracker Jacks had prizes inside the box until he crapped a decoder ring and some temporary tattoos.

Having said all that, my son has a peanut allergy that could be fatal, so the only candy we have is Hershey's milk chocolate because they are not processed in a facility that handles peanuts. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...