Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The DE Position


Woodie

Recommended Posts

Ok, I'm on record for not being 100% sold on the Butler pick.  I feel he is somewhat redundant, and I do have some reservations of him as a player.  With that said, I trust Gettleman, and bow to his superior knowledge.  So, I will give him a fair shot.

With that said, many feel that DE is a major position of need for us, and can't believe that if we went DL that it wasn't one of the DE's.  But, what if the team likes the guys already on the team as much if not more than what was available to us.  What if they don't see it as the major need that many fans and media think?

While we believe guys like Dodd or Ogbah could be CJ's replacement, Gettleman may see guys like Miley and Cox as the answer.  He may not think DE is the absolute must pick that many of us do.  We already have one solid starting DE and some solid depth, but what if the team truly believes that the answer really is on the roster? 

I think we need to be patient and wait and see how the 2016 team is put together.  By the time the season starts, we all may be saying "Dodd who" "Ogbah who."  After all, I remember thinking that if Cox can produce like he did in preseason in regular season games that we could have a special pass rusher on our hands.  And Gettleman singled out Miley as someone already on the roster that he really likes.  So, who knows, we may find a surprise in our stocking come September.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Nate Dogg said:

We have 5 more picks man.

True, but many felt DE was a bigger need than DT in the 1st, and my point was that while that may seem to be the case, Gettleman may not see it as big of a need as some fans.  It's not about us being able to fill a need, but is there really a major need to fill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Woodie said:

True, but many felt DE was a bigger need than DT in the 1st, and my point was that while that may seem to be the case, Gettleman may not see it as big of a need as some fans.  It's not about us being able to fill a need, but is there really a major need to fill.

Gettleman does not draft for need. He's said it over and over. You can disagree with that but he does what he says.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, csx said:

Gettleman does not draft for need. He's said it over and over. You can disagree with that but he does what he says.

But that has nothing to do with what I'm saying.  I'm trying to make the point (and obviously doing a poor job of it) of saying that Gettleman may really like the young guys already on our roster.  And that despite what many fans and media think, DE may not be a big need. 

It's more about how Gettleman sees the potential of Delaire, Cox, Miley, etc., than anything else.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a thought on it.  Guys you draft "have" to be, or will become, better than those guys on your roster.  I think as Gettleman looks at players, he's constantly debating them versus what he already has.  While it's easy for the media to say what they want, like why we didn't draft Dodd or someone, Gettleman has done a great job of roster building his way.  It could be that there wasn't a huge difference between these late first guys and 4th rounders in their evaluation.  And that our guys have the traits to be better than those guys.

I don't know, I'm full of it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Woodie said:

But that has nothing to do with what I'm saying.  I'm trying to make the point (and obviously doing a poor job of it) of saying that Gettleman may really like the young guys already on our roster.  And that despite what many fans and media think, DE may not be a big need. 

It's more about how Gettleman sees the potential of Delaire, Cox, Miley, etc., than anything else.   

It's more about viewing Butler as having much higher potential in the system than any other player available 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, csx said:

Gettleman does not draft for need. He's said it over and over. You can disagree with that but he does what he says.

Everyone drafts with their own basis of bias, preference and need.

Gentlemen does too.  

His entire hogmolly pledge from day one shows he has a bias/slant that influences who he picks

again, I don't dislike Dave or his pick.  Dave still has time to make everything right....but given he has gone overboard at DT he has some extra work IMO left before he gets the thumbs up on the pick 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Castavar said:

I can't believe people are totally dismissing Delaire. I still think he will be something special. I also heard he was playing injured last year.

There's reason to be somewhat cautious on the Delaire hype. His breakout game came against the Bucs rookie OT who sucked and there was no tape of Delaire at the time. Then he got some good pressure the following game against Seattle's terrible OL. Then there was enough tape on him and he basically disappeared for the rest of the season. I think he's solid and will get better. He's got the athleticism but he needs plenty of work. If he turns into Mario Addison then I will be thrilled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you draft for need and reach. You often get less talent from your selection. Unless your picking in the top 15 having a need and BPA be the the same player is very rare. You have to trust your scouts and draft board you spent so much time making. If a player is left at the top of your board you take him regardless of position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...