Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Good read on UDFA WR Keyarris Garrett


LUUUUUKE

Recommended Posts

I really like him and I honestly I wouldn't have blinked if he was drafted in the 3rd or 4th rounds. However, I will say that his small hands and drop issues are worrisome. We have enough trouble with drops already lol. I would love it if we could get a sure handed WR. Competition for the 4th and 5th WR spots should be Intense. Brown, Hill, Garrett, Norwood, Bersin and Byrd will be an interesting battle to watch in preseason.

KB, Funch and Ginn are obviously locks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bartin said:

I really like him and I honestly I wouldn't have blinked if he was drafted in the 3rd or 4th rounds. However, I will say that his small hands and drop issues are worrisome. We have enough trouble with drops already lol. I would love it if we could get a sure handed WR. Competition for the 4th and 5th WR spots should be Intense. Brown, Hill, Garrett, Norwood, Bersin and Byrd will be an interesting battle to watch in preseason.

KB, Funch and Ginn are obviously locks.

Its why I want to sign Boldin. KB, Boldin, Ginn, Funchess, Brown, and Garrett would make a nice group of WRs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Bartin said:

I really like him and I honestly I wouldn't have blinked if he was drafted in the 3rd or 4th rounds. However, I will say that his small hands and drop issues are worrisome. We have enough trouble with drops already lol. I would love it if we could get a sure handed WR. Competition for the 4th and 5th WR spots should be Intense. Brown, Hill, Garrett, Norwood, Bersin and Byrd will be an interesting battle to watch in preseason.

KB, Funch and Ginn are obviously locks.

Small hands yes, drop issues no. He doesn't have drop issues, you're just pulling that out of your ass. PFF credits him with only two drops on catchable balls for the entire season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KillerKat said:

Its why I want to sign Boldin. KB, Boldin, Ginn, Funchess, Brown, and Garrett would make a nice group of WRs.

I think people are overlooking Hill. He has been mentioned several times since last year's training camp,  by Gettleman,  Rivera and Cam. 

KB

Funchess 

Ginn 

Hill

Garrett 

Maybe Philly,  if they decide to keep six

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of encouraging detail & stats about Garret in the Reception Perception analysis of this year's WR prospects

http://www.thebackyardbanter.com/reception-perception-2016-nfl-draft-prospects-results.html

Over the last several draft classes, the trend of college receivers entering the league with experience lining up on just one side of the field continues emerging. Last year, both Kevin White and Dorial Green-Beckham fit that mold. This year, All four of Kenny Lawler (98.5), Keyarris Garrett (97.6) and Josh Doctson (94.3) took over 94 percent of their Reception Perception sampled snaps from the right wide receiver spot.

...

With such drop problems infecting some of the best receivers in this class, those who make clean catches deserve recognition. Rashard Higgins has some of the best hands in this class on film, and recorded the second lowest drop rate (2.0). Keyarris Garrett is not a perfect player, but has no drop problems in his game. Doctson, Carroo and Sterling Shepard are the shining group of top-level prospects that don’t let drops creep onto their tape. 

....

If you’re looking for arbitrage plays within this draft class, there are two that reveal themselves here with their 72.7 conversion rates. Cal’s Kenny Lawler is quietly one of the best players at winning contested catches, and carries a similar frame to Josh Doctson. Keyarris Garret is just as strong at playing in tight coverage at the catch point, and comes with a similar build to Laquon Treadwell. Teams that miss out on the duo in the first round should consider these potential discounted versions later on in the draft. 

...

Corey Coleman, Malcolm Mitchell and Keyarris Garrett charted out with route trees heavily skewed toward screens, slants, curls or nine-routes. Now, that’s not worth holding against them as prospects, considering that they all posted above average SRVC scores in prior sections. You can only scout a player based on what they were asked to do in college. All three have the athleticism to carve out high-value roles on just those limited routes in the NFL, while Mitchell and Coleman are already ahead of the game from a timing perspective. 

...

Given that Keyarris Garrett also has that massive frame, it was perplexing to see him so regularly go down on first contact. Garrett was out “in space” on 15.8 percent of his routes, the second highest rate in the class, but was brought down on first contact on 69 percent of those attempts. Garrett has the athletic traits and size to be a real threat after the catch, but his NFL team will have to help him develop those into tangible skills.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just chasing targets is a fools game. Chase averaged 85 yrds and .76 TDs per game his first year and 87.16 yrds, and .75 TD's per game his second year. Statistically the same. NOT an improvement. Puka saw no increase either. Yes, Waddle's went down because he had to share targets with another receiver - just like TMac will have to share targets with Coker next year so you have actually just made my point concerning Coker. Olave saw an increase in targets but Carr replaced Dalton and even with the increase in targets, his production was pretty flat (83 extra yards and 1 more TD for the entire year). And Wilson's number did increase but the Jets replaced the other two receivers and their contribution was significantly down from Davis's and Moore's. Again, nothing in those numbers should lead anyone to believe there will be a big leap for Tmac next year.       
    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
×
×
  • Create New...