Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

About those corners...


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

If the G'Fatha and staff get these CB's to work for us I will totally give him credit but from what I've seen on (the admittedly very little in some cases) film thats out there from highlight tapes, to game film, to Senior Bowl practice tape/game film etc. these young men are at best going to take a while to develop. These guys do not appear to be ready to contribute more than moderately in the near future.

If we're just going to have to use the guys on the roster that we had beforehand or bring another vet in at CB then it maybe would have been nice to draft players at a position with immediate impact potential for us in the first 3 rounds (DE?). I understand building for the long haul as well as short term but we definitely have spots that need improving to get us over the hump short term as well. Will certainly be interesting to look back as the season goes. Obviously hope G-Man made more Gettlemagic with these selections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BombzAway said:

If the G'Fatha and staff get these CB's to work for us I will totally give him credit but from what I've seen on (the admittedly very little in some cases) film thats out there from highlight tapes, to game film, to Senior Bowl practice tape/game film etc. these young men are at best going to take a while to develop. These guys do not appear to be ready to contribute more than moderately in the near future.

If we're just going to have to use the guys on the roster that we had beforehand or bring another vet in at CB then it maybe would have been nice to draft players at a position with immediate impact potential for us in the first 3 rounds (DE?). I understand building for the long haul as well as short term but we definitely have spots that need improving to get us over the hump short term as well. Will certainly be interesting to look back as the season goes. Obviously hope G-Man made more Gettlemagic with these selections.

I understand your logic but why would a DE pick contribute more than a cb? An end wouldn't start over Johnson or Ealy either. The only position I could see starting would be on the secondary or if we had landed a top OT. Other than these areas a draft pick isn't starting for this team IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, csx said:

I understand your logic but why would a DE pick contribute more than a cb? An end wouldn't start over Johnson or Ealy either. The only position I could see starting would be on the secondary or if we had landed a top OT. Other than these areas a draft pick isn't starting for this team IMO.

Pretty much what gettleman said in his presser.  He likes the ends too much to spend a pick on another.  They are high on delaire, cox and miley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bogart said:

Are you like mentally challenged or something?  The probability is good you have no clue how to build a football team and trying to scream nana nana boo boo with incoherent bullshit doesn't help your case.

which has zero to do with what i said... no one screamed nana nana boo boo! and the incoherence you experience is more likely on your end not mine.But keep swinging you may hit something eventually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tiger7_88 said:

So in your professional football opinion, there have been no good professional talent evaluators in the NFL since the beginning of NFL time since picks have ALWAYS been traded for other draft picks in this league.

That is the logical conclusion to what you are saying, right? That heel31ok has discovered the ULTIMATE secret to the NFL Draft Code that *no* other professional football draft evaluator has ever been able to crack? 

so are you auditioning for new dem press secretary? try to stay on subject without making up new premises that don't exist in the context of the subject...you and Bogart must we study buddies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Actually it's also about the number of spots available on the roster.

The reason why we traded up last year was because we didn't have room for nine rookies on an already crowded roster.

Same situation applies this year.

Someone with team building experience knows that.

at least you give a logical answer without making crap up...  the conclusion then is there were no other prospects who could improve the team enough to win a spot ? Or maybe GMAN  didn't want to make changes at certain spots? that could be true but it is also true that you don't have to keep everybody you bring in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, heel31ok said:

at least you give a logical answer without making crap up...  the conclusion then is there were no other prospects who could improve the team enough to win a spot ? Or maybe GMAN  didn't want to make changes at certain spots? that could be true but it is also true that you don't have to keep everybody you bring in.

Not keeping who you bring in is wasted resources. You could, say, use that resource to move up in the draft and choose someone you actually really want. He is content at DE and didn't think the rookies available would have any more impact than someone we already have. It wasn't valuable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, beckersteen said:

Not keeping who you bring in is wasted resources. You could, say, use that resource to move up in the draft and choose someone you actually really want. He is content at DE and didn't think the rookies available would have any more impact than someone we already have. It wasn't valuable. 

Sorry but no.the very nature of the business of the NFL makes your wasted resourcev theory Unrealistic...the wasted resource would be not making more picks when you have the gold standard making the picks...every team brings in more prospectsvwhich give more opportunity to improve with little or no b downside ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

Sorry but no.the very nature of the business of the NFL makes your wasted resourcev theory Unrealistic...the wasted resource would be not making more picks when you have the gold standard making the picks...every team brings in more prospectsvwhich give more opportunity to improve with little or no b downside ...

Actually his 'wasted resources' comment is exactly right.

The choice would be between using three draft picks to get one good player and two who won't make it out of camp versus trading away the two lower picks to move up and get a great player.

That's smart management, and smart teams do it all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Actually his 'wasted resources' comment xactly right.

The choice woul d be between using three draft picks to get one good player and two who won't make it out of camp versus trading away the two lower picks to move up and get a great player.

That's smart management, and smart teams do it all the time.

So There were no iOther Players as good available? Very unlikely...we reached, which makes the pt Of less to get more invalid...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, heel31ok said:

So There were no iOther Players as good available? Very unlikely...we reached, which makes the pt Of less to get more invalid...

As the draft goes on, the quality of the players available gets lower.

The equation is simple: One good player and two who won't make the roster means you wind up with one good player. Packaging the picks means you don't waste your time on two guys who weren't going to make it anyway and you wind up with one great player.

It's not hard to understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

As the draft goes on, the quality of the players available gets lower.

The equation is simple: One good player and two who won't make the roster means you wind up with one good player. Packaging the picks means you don't waste your time on two guys who weren't going to make it anyway and you wind up with one great player.

It's not hard to understand.

Oh, so We got iOur Licks in early and that makes the choice better or great even...the timing iOf the pick is the key if we took the same players later it would not have been As good a pick...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

S the draft tthe quality os play ers avai lable gets lower. 

The equation is simple: One good player and two who won't make the roster means you wind up with one good player. Packaging the picks means you don't waste your time on two guys who weren't going to make it anyway and you wind up with one great player.

It's not hard to understand.

You dont Lose anything with the extra pick and with thev great Talent evaluation you have more opportunity to improve...thats Not hard to understand...well u It shouldn't Be...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I need to redo my sub then.  Didn't realize that
    • Here is how I see it. I haven't read through all the comments so it has probably been said. We had ONE way, just one single way to win that game against the Bills. With us having a QB who decided he wanted to switch teams real quick, the only chance (and yes, still a small chance) to win that game was run the ball, with one of top, most violent RB's in the league, down the throat of one of the worst defenses in the league. You start the first play and you keep doing it until the final whistle. Doing this keeps the ball out of the hands of our QB who forgot what he was supposed to be doing that day. It keeps the ball out of the hands of a solid offense you would have to stop. You run the ball with the guy who gets more yards, which in turn should net you more points (I think Dave forgot that getting more yards is better than less yards though, so I hope someone let him know this after the game). Running the ball also can eat up the clock if successful. So the only way we win is a slow, methodical low scoring game where we own the time of possession. What does Dave do? The exact opposite of all that. Dave honest the god, took the best gameplan you  could use, a gameplan any 10 year old that only watches every other game would know to use, that every single fan knows you had to use, Dave's gameplan was to do the exact opposite of that. Dave thought it is better to use a RB that would net you way less yards than the other. Someone will have to explain why it is better to 1/3 the yards you could get (explain why a 4 yard gain is better than a 12 yard gain.) I honestly dont know why less yards is better. It seems like some are saying guys are happier and have more fun the following Monday if they lose but someone is happier because they got to run more? That confuses me. Dave decided instead to put the ball in the hands of a QB who would forget which way they are going down the field, and that's the game has a timer, which ends when the timer goes to zero. Not only does Dave decide to play the players that do worse in practice and games, he will avoid the plays that would seem to have the most chance of success, he decides to keep to the plays that don't work. In orher words, if history shows the play would yield success, you dont use that play. If you have been using a play that does not work at all, that means you should not use any other play except the ones that dont work. Dave will have to explain that strategy also because I don't understand it.  And finally, those who actually watch the whole game can see it, Dave Canales shows an immense amount of fear. He was scared to death of the Bills. You can't get that from the box score. You also can't understand just how much his fear contributes to the loss. Thats why people who say it was all Dalton just don't have the mental capacity to judge, or did not watch at all (only looked at numbers). For example, I think it was the second drive (maybe forth). Dave stopped a touchdown, it was all him. Rico does what Rico does (made Dave look dumb by showing more yards are better than less) and busts out something like a 40 yard run. Things are rolling. Instead of keeping the drive rolling Dave said "hold up, less points are better than more points...i have to stop this." So he pulls out a play so dumb that it leaves the place in shock. He puts Dalton out wide where everyone knows he is worthless, making the decision that we are onlying using 10 players this play, and we don't feel like have a QB at the moment....the perfect time for wildcat (because we are cats too). Its executed exactly as Dave hoped for, flawlessly...a loss of yards. Booyah. Things looking good. Now it's time to put it in Dalton's hands to seal the deal. It goes off perfectly. Buffalo gets the ball. Dave proves he is a genius. I guess I was wrong about him...
×
×
  • Create New...