Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Luke and TD are the League's best LB duo


Recommended Posts

there's always one

Quote

crosseyedlemon • 7 hours ago
It's one thing to look dominate against bad teams from the NFC East but this season the Panthers will have some tougher opponents to face. It's also hard to imagine them posting a +20 turnover ratio again...so this season won't be the cakewalk they had last year.

off the top of my head didn't we beat all the NFC playoff teams except for minnesota?  including a 49-15 pasting of a 13-3 team?

yeah our 2016 schedule is harder on paper but sometimes it feels like the entire world thinks we're an 8-8 team that accidentally won 15 games.

e: holy poo did i really type "off the top of my dead"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

there's always one

off the top of my dead didn't we beat all the NFC playoff teams except for minnesota?  including a 49-15 pasting of a 13-3 team?

yeah our 2016 schedule is harder on paper but sometimes it feels like the entire world thinks we're an 8-8 team that accidentally won 15 games.

Nah, an 11-5 team that went 15-1. And looked great doing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice analysis.  It looks like the whole series could be quite instructive.

I do have to laugh a bit though because PFF gave TD such terrible marks in terms of run defense, and then they go ahead and love on him in this article about how he and Luke are "superb" against the run.  LOL.

But the article does a great job of explaining how TD & Luke excel in spite of the ways our defensive scheme puts a lot of added pressure and responsibility on them.  Love it.

 

8 hours ago, L-TownCat said:

they win because that's what they want.  You tell one of them no, and see what happens.

L-Town, I so TOTALLY agree with what you wrote about their will to win.  I know we all point to Josh's game-saving interception against N Orleans, but TD's interception against Rodgers, Luke's OT interception of Luck were similarly crucial and game-winning plays.  And then there's TD's "hands-team" grab of the onsides kick by Seattle to ensure our playoff win... Those two guys repeatedly changed the outcomes of games...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Luke and TD, I think what we see are two players who can literally will plays into existence.  These two guys are truly great, and we are so lucky as Panther fans. 

Just think how folks hated those respective picks... =P

Now if Shaq is able to develop and improve...oh boy...we could run a straight 4-3 the entire game!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

there's always one

off the top of my dead didn't we beat all the NFC playoff teams except for minnesota?  including a 49-15 pasting of a 13-3 team?

yeah our 2016 schedule is harder on paper but sometimes it feels like the entire world thinks we're an 8-8 team that accidentally won 15 games.

These were the same people who said we didn't play anybody in the regular season and that we would get blown out by Seattle in playoffs. Errrr what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

yeah our 2016 schedule is harder on paper but sometimes it feels like the entire world thinks we're an 8-8 team that accidentally won 15 games.

Of course, historically we ARE an 8-8 team, with just under a .500 win percentage over the team's history.  And, also, regression to the mean is a pretty well-documented statistical pattern..., so it's not too hard to understand these kind of comments about the Panthers' falling off a cliff.

Speaking of regression to the mean:

I was browsing through some of the blog entries at football perspective this week, and I came across an article from last year about team wins and regression to the mean

http://www.footballperspective.com/regression-to-the-mean-and-team-wins/

Looking at the data for team wins from 2003 - 2014, they attempted to come up with a formula to predict wins in the following season:

Quote

to predict future wins, start with a constant for all teams (5.51 wins), and then add only 0.31 wins for every prior win. In other words, three additional wins in Year N-1 aren’t even enough to project one full extra win in Year N! That’s a remarkable amount of regression to the mean, even if not necessarily surprising.

Using that formula would mean we would be expected to win 10 games in 2016. 

But of course, using that formula, we were only expected to win 7.8 games in 2015.  HAH!

Over time regression to the mean is pretty valid, but season-to-season, one has to take into account the factors that led a team to such out-performance, and we've got all our coaches, and all our key players except J-No & Harper returning.  So... I wouldn't predict a Panthers regression to the mean this season. 

I'm not predicting we'll win 15 games again either.  That's incredibly hard to do.  But I think 12-4 is probably our floor.  and 13-3 or 14-2 extremely possible....

Anyway, it's interesting to look at that table comparing "predicted wins" vs. real wins. 

With our 7.2 wins above our "expected" win total in 2015, we would be number two in terms of most-outperforming teams since 2003, behind only the 2004 Steelers.

Expected wins.png

 

http://www.footballperspective.com/regression-to-the-mean-and-team-wins/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KB_fan said:

Of course, historically we ARE an 8-8 team, with just under a .500 win percentage over the team's history.  And, also, regression to the mean is a pretty well-documented statistical pattern..., so it's not too hard to understand these kind of comments about the Panthers' falling off a cliff.

Speaking of regression to the mean:

I was browsing through some of the blog entries at football perspective this week, and I came across an article from last year about team wins and regression to the mean

http://www.footballperspective.com/regression-to-the-mean-and-team-wins/

Looking at the data for team wins from 2003 - 2014, they attempted to come up with a formula to predict wins in the following season:

Using that formula would mean we would be expected to win 10 games in 2016. 

But of course, using that formula, we were only expected to win 7.8 games in 2015.  HAH!

Over time regression to the mean is pretty valid, but season-to-season, one has to take into account the factors that led a team to such out-performance, and we've got all our coaches, and all our key players except J-No & Harper returning.  So... I wouldn't predict a Panthers regression to the mean this season. 

I'm not predicting we'll win 15 games again either.  That's incredibly hard to do.  But I think 12-4 is probably our floor.  and 13-3 or 14-2 extremely possible....

Anyway, it's interesting to look at that table comparing "predicted wins" vs. real wins. 

With our 7.2 wins above our "expected" win total in 2015, we would be number two in terms of most-outperforming teams since 2003, behind only the 2004 Steelers

I know it's not the Official Prediction thread but I've gone over your math,,,in detail. After going over the numbers and using some of your advanced metrics I've come up with the most likely prediction...19-0.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • THE WALKER BACKGROUND Here is where this gets weird.  Walker is a serviceable LT who could benefit from Gilbert's experience and coaching.  However, he is known for below-average run blocking and frequent penalties.  As you know, a penalty from a LT is a drive killer. A former 7th round pick, Walker has outperformed expectations, but he still ranks around the middle of the pack when compared to other tackles.  Having said that, it seems as if the Panthers are banking on Walker for a year and will then make a decision on Ickey.  In Green Bay, Walker was the starter, but the Packers weren't exactly sold on him. While most people think the oft-injured David Bakhtiari retired in 2023, he really wanted to keep playing.  He was released on March, 11, 2024.  Walker stepped in and took the reserve LT job from Nijman in that 2023 season, but they were close--probably because Nijman was more of a swing OT.  However, Nijman was a free agent in 2024, so the Panthers signed him just a week after Bakhtiari was released, leaving the Packers only Walker to play LT.  A month later, the Packers drafted a LT in the first round, Jordan Morgan out of Arizona.  Most Packer fans believe that Morgan would have beat out Walker for the LT job in 2024, but he had some shoulder injuries and went to IR after 6 games. In 2025, when the Packers had an injury at G during the season, instead of putting Morgan in at LT for Walker as planned, they played Morgan to guard because Walker can only play 1 position.  The Packers currently project Morgan back to LT for 2026, which is probably why they did not seek to retain Walker, at least in part. Based on this history, it is safe to say this: Walker is better than Nijman. We have the benefit of them being on the same team in a direct competition to help us see that. Walker is probably closer to Ickey, except for the penalties.  That bothers me a lot.  Bryce sucks when we get behind the sticks, and a run-first offense with a poor run-blocking LT is not ideal.   Regardless, I think Ickey and the Panthers find themselves in limbo right now, so the Walker deal comes at a perfect time for the GM.  Gilbert, perhaps, can work on the penalties and maybe a TE like Tremble can help offset the run blocking issues, so maybe we can actually stay the course at OT.  Maybe we do not draft a LT--maybe we draft a RT to groom behind Moton.  Maybe we draft a C.  At LT, the Panthers do not want to overreact, especially if Ickey returns to form or Walker demonstrates improvement.  Depth is certainly a concern, but a solid RT can be that depth.   I doubt the Panthers draft a LT in rounds one or maybe two.  It seems we have bigger needs at Will LB, DT, TE, and maybe S.  
    • THIS! IF we go offense at 19, it should be the trenches, which is no longer a pressing need with Waler's signing. 3 biggest needs in 2026, IMO, are DT, FS, ILB. We need to upgrade our starters at those positions and I expect anyone rafted at 19 to start immediately. I could rationalize OT (right or left) or CB since we're an injury away from a severe drop off AND have huge offseason concerns at both next year. Unless Bryce plays a lot better, I want to upgrade QB next year so I could get behind locking in a 2027 starter this year if the right guy is there. You COULD argue NCB and TE are positions where we need to upgrade our starters, sure, but not at 19. Both positions can still be upgraded on day 2.
    • He's firmly a second rounder and I don't think we would go that high for a TE this draft.  Third?  Possibly. I mean Rhule drafted Tremble in the third round who clearly was just a blocking TE.  
×
×
  • Create New...