Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who Can Do it Better...?


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

For the sake of the conversation let’s just assume the following is our ''Week One offense'' , the question is who in the NFL is better…?

 

QB-

Cam Newton

 

HB-

Jonathan Stewart

Fozzy Whittaker/Cameron Artis-Payne

 

FB-

Mike Tolbert

 

WR-

Kelvin Benjamin

Devin Funchess

Ted Ginn Jr

Philly Brown

Stephen Hill

 

TE-

Greg Olsen

Ed Dickson/Beau Sandland

 

In all seriousness gentleman I’m curious across the NFL who boasts a better set of QB and skill position players on offense across ALL the position groups?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If only gentlemen can vote that really restricts the participation around here, not to mention shutting out the ladies. lol

We had all these guys as starters in the SB and came up short so I'm not that enthusiastic about claiming we've got the best players at the skill positions. It's a team game and you've gotta have all the parts meshing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, caatfan said:

If only gentlemen can vote that really restricts the participation around here, not to mention shutting out the ladies. lol

We had all these guys as starters in the SB and came up short so I'm not that enthusiastic about claiming we've got the best players at the skill positions. It's a team game and you've gotta have all the parts meshing. 

No, not all these guys played in the SB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, considering the fact that we had the #1 offense in the NFL last year and we essentially have the exact same squad coming back plus getting a healthy KB back and having Darryl Williams competing at OT to possibly improve our two weakest position groups... I'd argue no one is better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only offense I can think of that might give us a run is the Steelers.  Ben, Leveon, Brown, and now green at TE is a very well rounded group. If Martavis wasnt suspended id probably give them the edge. Of course we have a better coach, defense, and QB which is why we went 15-1 and they went whatever they went.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh... I'd be cautious definitively stating that Rivera is better than Tomlin. Tomlin has coached 9 seasons and has won a Super Bowl, been to another, and been to the playoffs 6 times.  He's never had a losing season as a head coach (two .500 seasons).  He's 92-52 as a head coach for a 64% win rate.  That's a really damn solid resume.

I personally think that Rivera is the better coach right now and that's what matters most, but I could understand someone arguing otherwise and if they both retired today, Tomlin would go down as the better coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say the Panthers are at the top.  A few other teams are in that convo but maybe aren't quite as well rounded.

Steelers are in that convo, certainly. I'd say Arizona and Greenbay are as well. And... surprisingly if Bortles continues to progress, Jacksonville might not be too far away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that last year (and a lot of history) was a good lesson that having good skill position players does not translate into more wins or a great offense.

Think about all of the teams in recent history that get over hyped because everyone likes to look at their flashy skill positions (Colts, Falcons, Lions, Cowboys, etc)  and vice versa (Seahawks, Patriots, Chiefs, 49ers, Ravens, etc).  How come all the great skill position players the Jags had last year couldnt get them over the hump? Its still mostly about tackling and blocking and being physical.

Sorry if thats not what this conversation is about, but i wanted to point that out.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, imminent rogaine said:

I'd say the Panthers are at the top.  A few other teams are in that convo but maybe aren't quite as well rounded.

Steelers are in that convo, certainly. I'd say Arizona and Greenbay are as well. And... surprisingly if Bortles continues to progress, Jacksonville might not be too far away.

Was in the process of mentioning the jags. Bortles, Ivory/Yeldon, J Thomas, and Arob/Hurndog is an impressive group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, EightyNine said:

I think that last year (and a lot of history) was a good lesson that having good skill position players does not translate into more wins or a great offense.

Think about all of the teams in recent history that get over hyped because everyone likes to look at their flashy skill positions (Colts, Falcons, Lions, Cowboys, etc)  and vice versa (Seahawks, Patriots, Chiefs, 49ers, Ravens, etc).  How come all the great skill position players the Jags had last year couldnt get them over the hump? Its still mostly about tackling and blocking and being physical.

Sorry if thats not what this conversation is about, but i wanted to point that out.

 

This. Our receivers aren't great. We have a 1 (IF he comes back as good as 2013), and a ton of 3's. Not really a problem. Seattle and New England have been doing just fine with similar talent, while Calvins team keeps missing the playoffs. 

Main two things I attribute to our #1 offense...

1: 30.53 - Offense average starting field position (Ranked 2nd)

2: .196 - Defense turnovers per drive (Ranked 1st)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how even our own fan base is greatly under estimating Brandon Wegher!

 

unedited, as of early June of 2016, I think we have a loaded backfield when others think its a weakness

 

i really think Wegher will be the stud of the future and CAP will be a good change of pace

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not in same league. Caldwell just hit a 10.00 on the RAS. 2nd out of 3830 from 1987 onward.  https://x.com/MathBomb/status/2027885023387349047 Yeah I mean Louis had a sub 9.00 RAS. Still very very good, no doubt. Louis is small, no 2 ways about it. He is likely a sub package lb in nickel packages or specialized WLB. Be fine ST gunner to start for sure. 6 foot flat and 220lb is pushing it for a starting LB. At 10 to 20lbs less than the other LBs he'd better be closer to the top in most timed drills. He's gonna be challenged when some of the wrs in the class can matchup bigger stronger faster, much less TE in the run game.  Yeah instinct matter and he has them, but that size is a massive red flag compared to many of the other LBS in this class.    Rodriguez is the LB that really climbed this week from a pure grit guy to great flash with athleticism people wrote off cause he was a QB at first at UVA. 18.4mph in the backpedal. Production the last 2 years were great. I'd be thrilled with him as the future mike.   Hill likely moved out of 51 and into the top 45 picks ( Ravens at 45 I can't imagine don't bite if he makes it there). Honestly Hill imo is a 1st rounder and I'd be ok with him as he fits the MLB we have missed the last few years. People would crow it's a reach but he's top 30 all-time I'm RAS for a LB at 9.9+ . Plus he was big time in big games when he was healthy. And that br a big check: meds. 
    • Miller, Melo, Coby, Moose, and Bridges all on the floor at the same time must be a nightmare for defenses lol. Switch one out for Kon and still a nightmare. Coby really does bring a true 6th man value and looks like he could start if Melo was out after only a few games of getting his feet wet. 
×
×
  • Create New...