Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stephen Hill. Fluff,or real?


top dawg

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, The Lone Panther said:

Garrett won't last on the PS, so I think it will be Byrd.  They'll keep Byrd quiet with limited snaps in the pre-season so no team will pick him up.  Let him continue to develop and he could end up being Ginn's replacement after this season.  

KB

Fun

Ginn

Brown

Hill

Garrett

Well, he did last for 7 rounds in the draft...so someone immediately picking him up and putting him on their 53 man squad is far from a given.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Huddler said:

I dont think Garrett makes it onto the roster. We already have length and speed. What can he add to special teams? Probably nothing. While Byrd and Hill can. 

The only certainty we have for speed is Brown and Ginn. Both have questionable hands. Garrett has speed and hands. With Garrett's potential and threat to be taken away from PS, I see us carrying 6 and him being one of them. The 6th spot I see between Hill, Byrd, and Bersin. All 3 of which I'm pretty sure would stay on the PS if we stashed either one there. I'm hoping Hill finally lives up to the hype and we have a KB, Funch, Ginn, Brown, Garrett, and Hill WR group. I just don't think it would be right to cut Garrett in favor of Bersin or Byrd who is another Philly Brown who also has trouble with punt returns. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 15 said:

Is Hill still PS eligible? If so, one has to think that the leading receiver in college football last year would be picked up off the PS over a dude that's been a couple different teams already - recovering from an ACL injury. 

It would be so wrong to cut Garrett for Byrd or Bersin. Hill, maybe. But the other 2 definitely no. I'm hoping we carry 6 and both Hill and Garrett are on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Huddler said:

Meh respectfully agree to disagree

 

i think we have a gem in byrd. Gem as in a #3/4 reciever who has elite speed and can take it to the house any play. 2/3 catches a game for chunks

Garrett has more upside than Byrd, Bersin, or Hill. He has speed and hands. All of the other three don't (judging from the past). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Garrett has more upside than Byrd, Bersin, or Hill. He has speed and hands. All of the other three don't (judging from the past). 

Since when are Byrd's hands an issue? Never. And he is likely the fastest player on the team. No other receiver can touch him, even Ginn. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KillerKat said:

Garrett has more upside than Byrd, Bersin, or Hill. He has speed and hands. All of the other three don't (judging from the past). 

Doesn't HIll have 4.3 40yrd speed? Hill has wayyy more upside if he's able to return from injury and actually turn into a legit wr. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KillerKat said:

The only certainty we have for speed is Brown and Ginn. Both have questionable hands. Garrett has speed and hands. With Garrett's potential and threat to be taken away from PS, I see us carrying 6 and him being one of them. The 6th spot I see between Hill, Byrd, and Bersin. All 3 of which I'm pretty sure would stay on the PS if we stashed either one there. I'm hoping Hill finally lives up to the hype and we have a KB, Funch, Ginn, Brown, Garrett, and Hill WR group. I just don't think it would be right to cut Garrett in favor of Bersin or Byrd who is another Philly Brown who also has trouble with punt returns. 

Hill is the fastest player on the field for the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...