Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft Wishlist


WOW!!

Recommended Posts

On 6/20/2016 at 1:23 AM, Wundrbread33 said:

I'm all for taking a risk on Maker, but you know we aren't picking him.

Even if we did, we would give up on him and trade him instead of developing what he can bring to the table.

Who knows if we actually wanted to develop Noah, but simply saw an opportunity that presented itself after Aldridge didn't re-sign with Portland.

Also, having our own D-League team down the road will probably be a lot different than sending guys to random flyover states thousands of miles away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, carolina-chuck2 said:

People are comparing their greatness. No one is dumb enough to say theyre the same type of player.

You overestimate the intelligence of the majority of humanity.

Back to the point though. I made a comparison, you didn't like it, but who gives a poo.

Every "comparison" is useless anyway because no player is exactly like another. Most comparisons are actually made because two guys LOOK similar. I see Valentine most compared to Danny Green...but why? Skin tone, height, average athleticism. 

Valentine is a much more versatile (and flashy) offensive player than Green. Much better passer. Better rebounder. I'd say Green is the better defender. But when you look at what Valentine brings to the table, Roy makes more sense than Green, who, once again, Valentine is often compared to because of skin tone and likeness in appearance.

All this is much ado about nothing, since draft time is always a let down with Cho and co. anyway...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, carolina-chuck2 said:

I said Draymond not Danny. But Wing Draymond, not a PF Draymond.

 

Roy was a PG. Much more athleticism and a better shooter

Roy could play 1-3. Better athlete but he was "above average" at best athletically. He was all about BBIQ...intangibles. He was crafty.

Valentine can also play 1-3 because he is an elite passer for a wing. He can stroke it from range. He rebounds well for his size. His game is also BBIQ and craftiness.

They both have knee issues.

I've seen worse comparisons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • we are not talking about the 5th we are talking about bryce being one of if not the worst starter in the nfl for the past 3 years.  Dont move the goalposts my man
    • The issue is the position Bryce plays. Finding a good/great quarterback isn't easy. Plus, it sometimes takes years for these guys to actually become good/great. What you have to look for is progress instead of regression. Bryce has shown that. Can he put it all together? We don't know yet. But that's why you place a smaller bet with the 5th year option, and wait to see. You could be wrong and lose your 30 mil bet, but you didn't hitch your wagon long-term and lose much more.
    • Absolutely not. That’s too much for replacement level player. Bryce may be that. Or he may turn into something more. If you can’t see the flashes, you’re willfully blind. There’s more bad than good right now, but there’s less bad than there was earlier in his career. He’s only 24 and he’s showing signs of improvement. He may never become consistent enough to justify a long term contract, but he’s shown enough to roll the dice on what effectively will turn into a 2 year, $30MM contract for the next two years to see if he can earn something longer.    Sure, in his one season starting, Howell managed to throw for 3,946 yards and toss 21 TDs, but it took throwing the ball an astounding 612 times. He also threw 21 INTs (for a particularly egregious 3.4 INT%). For all the talk of him being a deep ball thrower, he still only averaged 6.4 YPA, with an average air yards of 5.6 yards per attempt. And for all the excuses of Washington’s line giving him no protection (65 sacks taken that year), he was only pressured on 22.7% of his dropbacks, which is a few percentage points lower than what Bryce has had to deal with each year (24.2, 26.7, and 24.0%).    These are all numbers that are at best roughly equivalent to Bryce’s production the past two years. It’s wild to me people can claim so confidently that he’s a better QB. 
×
×
  • Create New...