Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2016 GS Warriors were the exact same team as 2016 Panthers


Hotsauce

Recommended Posts

No.

Golden State only has itself to blame, they never responded to the Cavs playing better defense, and Curry honestly was MIA almost the entire series. Losing a Super Bowl is much more probable for a regular season heavyweight as its just one game, but the Warriors had a 3-1 lead and threw it away. That's just sports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, xXxBretWeedxXx said:

I think what he meant was that the teams that hold the record for most regular season wins in each of the 4 major sports have not won the championship, not that the teams with the most wins of each season didn't ever win the championship. The Patriots, Red Wings, Mariners and now the Warriors all hold the record for most regular season wins in each sport and none of those teams won the title that year.

Ah. Gotcha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rigged my ass. All Draymond had to do was stop hitting people in the nuts, then he doesn't get suspended, and game 5 is theirs. But no, he just had to wake up a beast in LeBron and give the Cavs life, and they rode that momentum all the way to the chip.

Our superbowl was not rigged either. We played like absolute dogsh*t and the lights were too bright for us. Refs sucked dick, but they did all year and WE STILL had a chance to win but kept blowing opportunities. These rigged conspiracies are lazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yall need to learn about gematra before yall up and say sports is not rigged. Im a huge panther fan from the beginning, but I called what happend lastnight, the ncaa, college football, and the superbowl. If your eyes is not trained, then your still sleep. Its not just sports people. Rigged is not the right word. Controlled is like the wwe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not true. The 72 Dolphins and 85 Bears both won the Super Bowl, and I'm sure there are others (Niners of the 80s and Cowboys of the 90s probably had a couple).

The warriors and patriots surpased them. Read context old man. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not really. It all depends upon perspective. You can draft quality OTs high every year. They have one of the lowest bust rates by position. DTs, less so, but good ones still come along at a regular clip. With WRs, it's simply best to draft one in the first round if you want a legit play maker. Moreover, WR is going to set you back more than OT or DT at really all statuses, meaning JAG receivers are going to make more than JAG OTs and DTs, and elite receivers will make substantially more than elite OTs or DTs. I would also argue that it's much harder to find a franchise level OT or DT that can have an altering impact upon the game. So, if you don't believe they can, you may as well wait for day 2 or 3. That's why sticking to your board is probably the wisest thing to do. If you're not committed that the value is there, then what are you doing? Lastly, I don't think you should necessarily draft in a vacuum, but you must look at each team from year to year. People want to make them the same, but they're different. You have to start over every year and identify where the strengths and weaknesses are. You can't say, "Well we drafted [so and so] last year or two years ago, so we'll just draft this this year." That's not realistic and it can be highly counterproductive, especially in light of the reason that you should be trying to use FA to set up the draft.
    • If you read through his stuff, he's had a raging hate-boner for the Carolina Panthers the likes of which would make many long-tenured Huddlers blush. Every win was "yeah but" and every loss was "see I told you so".
    • Let me preface this by saying I've read WalterFootball on and off for 20 years. That's an indictment on my decision-making, and it's more than fair to be questioned.  However, the days of reading what's become weak ragebait have drawn to a close after he re-graded the 2025 NFL Draft's first round. He gave T-Mac a C on draft night. What was his re-grade for the NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year?  Carolina Panthers: Tetairoa McMillan, WR, Arizona – C Grade One-Year Grade: C+ Grade Tetairoa McMillan won Offensive Rookie of the Year, but only by default after Emeka Egbuka vanished in the second half of the season. McMillan was good, and was certainly limited by Bryce Young’s mediocrity, but there are still concerns about his work ethic and passion for football. If he doesn’t progress in the coming years, we’ll know why. Original Write-up: Wow, our Panthers source did not pan out for once. Jalon Walker was heavy chalk to go here, but the Panthers decided to draft a No. 1 receiver instead. While this fills a need, I’m concerned with Tetairoa McMillan’s work ethic, which is something you never want to hear from a first-round prospect, especially one who is chosen in the top 10. Bryce Young needs this, and McMillan is talented, but will he give 100 percent at the next level? Also, what about the defense, which was the worst in the NFL last year? https://walterfootball.com/nfldraftgrades2025.php
×
×
  • Create New...