Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lou Young vs Keyarris Garrett


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Ball is a safety. McClain, Young, and Johnson seem to be the guys needing to show they deserve a roster spot. 

Add a vet? I'd say it depends on who becomes available, as well as how the coaches feel about the group that's already here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Wasn't Lou hyped up by Norman before he left? Young was severely underrated coming into this camp. He's the type of DB that excels in our system.

I think it's Lou Young who's been picking up where JNo left off in terms of lots of extra reps after practice... Seems like he's really hungry and ready to do whatever it takes to try and get a spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, pantherclaw said:

I doubt a vet CB is signed at all.

It would go against everything the team has said about building young long-term depth at the position. Everything they have done (rescinding tag on Norman, cutting Boykin, not looking at a veteran guy like Cromartie/ Hall) should be immediatelty brought into question.

In the words of Mike Erhmantrout, "No Half Measures."

Unless there is an injury or Rivera and Gettleman sense the group isn't up to snuff, it would be completely incomprehensible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...