Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We have traded for Andy Lee from the Browns


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

Just now, CPF4LIFE said:

News flash......TEAMS TAKE STEPS BACK. All of the best organizations have there low points and end up picking high in the draft because they lose talent or guys careers are over. Please lets not act like this team didnt make the playoffs or a superbowl under Hurney. We were just never consistent. This team finally wins a superbowl, Hurney won't touch Gettleman . Gettleman has had a great start here in large part due to having cam and Luke 2 he guys HE DID NOT DRAFT and rivera he did not hire.  A building without a foundation will always crumble I will just leave it at that. 

Lastly, for comparison sake, who were the players already on this roster that compare to cam and Luke when Hurney took the job?

Before you glorify the winner of any race remember who had the head start and who didn't. Once again, just being realistic. 

Not at all "realistic".

Making the playoffs three times in eleven years is not "taking a step back".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love it! The weakest position on a super bowl team just became a strength for a late 4th rounder. 

Our defense is going to love going on the field after one of the best punters in NFL history switches the field or pins the opponent inside their own 20.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ctrcat said:

Primarily because the league took away our franchise player and $13+ million.  Secondarily because GMan had to clean up Hurney's mess and face the salary cap demon head on or kick the can down the road.

Did Hurney choose to sign DeCoud, Cason, Avant, Underwood? Did Hurney choose to invest in Bell as a starting LT and Chandler as the RT with a contract extension only to make a late season desperation move to find a sub par Remmers as a stop gap? Nope. That would be Gettleman. Just own the mistakes he made along with his wins. Be honest. 2014 was bad. Very bad. A win in the playoffs against a very beat up Cardinals team was just a consolation for winning an extremely awful division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

We all know 2014 was a terrible season that resulted in a losing record. Primarily due to the personnel decisions made in the 2014 off season. How is that consistently winning? That is a good season followed by a bad season. Then another good season. Seems to be the status quo outside the 2009/2010 seasons Jerry Richardson hijacked for his battle with the players over the CBA.

If going to the playoffs as a result of being the best of the worst only to get whooped by the NFC Champion is what you take pride in, then you clearly do not realize the problems this front office has caused and continue to cause for the veterans on the team.

If Cam Newton was as healthy in 2014 as he was in 2015....2014 would have been a good year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

Did Hurney choose to sign DeCoud, Cason, Avant, Underwood? Did Hurney choose to invest in Bell as a starting LT and Chandler as the RT with a contract extension only to make a late season desperation move to find a sub par Remmers as a stop gap? Nope. That would be Gettleman. Just own the mistakes he made along with his wins. Be honest. 2014 was bad. Very bad. A win in the playoffs against a very beat up Cardinals team was just a consolation for winning an extremely awful division.

Was the bum ankle, busted ribs, and car accident Gettleman's fault too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Xavier said:

 

This argument is often stated, but is so lacking in critical thinking.  Hurney got fired after Luke's rookie season, and after Cam's second in which he still a nascent, emergent talent, who had not flashed nearly the pocket passing ability he displayed last season.  Quarterbacks take time to develop obviously, as do rookies - so to say, "we were still losing with a 22 year old Cam Newton" is totally disingenuous.  We weren't even terrible, as we went from 1-15 to 6-10 with rookie Cam.

Look into Peyton Manning's rookie season:  here's a clue, the Colts went 3-13.  This isn't even a defense of Hurney, who I think deserved to get fired.  But to credit Gettleman's magnificent roster building skills for our turnaround last season, when in reality, it took an MVP performance from Cam Newton (that he was not capable of at 22 years old) to lift up a very mediocre offense into the best in the league, lacks any real credibility.

You can't have it both ways with Cam being the MVP, and Gettleman being the greatest GM ever.

Cam's numbers weren't as good as Brady or Carson Palmer, but I think we all recognized he deserved the MVP because he was playing with subpar talent?  Who is responsible for this subpart talent, despite the fact he has inherited a probowl running back, center, and tight end?

Did Cam have subpar talent last year or not?  Because if not, he probably doesn't deserve to be MVP.  Our roster is greatly overrated, and part of this is Hurney's fault for strapping us with bad contracts. 

Gettleman has been a terrific scout, as he was with the Giants.  He drafts very well, especially considering it's usually late.  I'd rather have him as GM than Hurney.  But he's not infallible, and has made a mistakes.  We can't just 'trust in Gettleman' when he is obviously doing dumb things because Cam Newton lifted us to 15-1 record last season. 

His record is more patchy than people are willing to admit, and he handled the summer of 2014 pretty terribly.  The Panthers turnaround has largely revolved around Cam improving as a player, and when he was off in 2014 due to injury, we went 7-8-1 even with 'the Godfather' in charge.

Creating an alt just to have somebody agree with your idiotic positions is really just pathetic, dude.

Oh, and FYI, the mods here have been known to ban people for creating alts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uhh wow...a 4th for a punter? It needed to be addressed but that is really steep and reeks of desperation to correct an offseason failure to properly address the position.

DG definitely made a mistake with the punter situation this offseason and honestly that's fine. No one is perfect and he's done more than enough to earn a screw up here and there but I do worry he doubled down on his mistake to make up for it. Even if he's great we overpaid but it would be excusable. We got screwed if he's simply an above average punter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andy Lee was a pro bowl Punter half a decade ago.  He's 34 now, and while punters often age well, all the analytics point to him having dropped off significantly in recent years, especially when it comes to precision and placement.

So if it makes you feel better to say we traded for a 'pro bowl, alltime great punter', sure, tell yourself what you need.  But it was ridiculous to pay a 4th round pick and take on a guy with a huge cap hit when the Browns paid a mere 7th rounder for this same guy last year (and that was when there was more hope he would return to his old form).

If it was done in a vacuum, it wouldn't even be that huge of a deal, but it now hampers our ability to go out and fill needs on the offensive line or pass rush (not to even mention the secondary), because

1- we lost a 4th round pick we could have used for someone else

2- significant cap hit for a punter, especially with a GM as frugal as Gettleman

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not at all "realistic".

Making the playoffs three times in eleven years is not "taking a step back".

And one of those years it was due to the division Just sucking that bad. We got in with a losing record, I want to say we were that good but I can't shake luck not having something to do with that. The 12-4 year we was consistently one of the best teams all season just to lose the first playoff game to Colin Kaepernick so I say this...... I want to see this team to do more and they are perfectly capable of doing more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

Did Hurney choose to sign DeCoud, Cason, Avant, Underwood? Did Hurney choose to invest in Bell as a starting LT and Chandler as the RT with a contract extension only to make a late season desperation move to find a sub par Remmers as a stop gap? Nope. That would be Gettleman. Just own the mistakes he made along with his wins. Be honest. 2014 was bad. Very bad. A win in the playoffs against a very beat up Cardinals team was just a consolation for winning an extremely awful division.

Did Gettleman choose to lead the team to Cap hell, causing huge contract concerns of overpaid costs for little value? Did Gettleman let his personal emotions get in the way of business and football? Nope. That would be Hurney. Just his own mistakes that would've lead to a very Saint-like organization today. Those Hurney contracts were bad. Very bad. Getting Cam and Luke in the top 10 of the draft was just a consolation for terribly managing the Panther's contracts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

We already know you're too stupid to watch football.

Did you create an alt just so you could have someone who didn't call you a moron?

Believe it or not there are many other people who do not agree with your Gettleman is God club of bullies.

13 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

I never considered Nortman as the long term solution. He was a stop gap, that was decent enough to tried to retain, but chose not to at the cost he was demanding. 

While they signed some FAs, I never considered them to be a part of the long term solution. 

The punting game is far to valuable, especially to a team that intends on contending for the Superbowl year in and year out. 

A future 4th rd pick for an all pro punter?  Sounds like long term fix to me.  

We should be greatful that our GM works so diligently.

Will it sound even better when the Panthers are paying him $4m, or is this just another draft pick thrown out the window like Norwood and Allen because the front office could not fix the issue in the offseason?

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

If Cam Newton was as healthy in 2014 as he was in 2015....2014 would have been a good year. 

Exactly my point. Thanks for the support and agreeing with me.

Just now, ctrcat said:

Was the bum ankle, busted ribs, and car accident Gettleman's fault too?

No. It just underlined a huge crutch that Gettleman has to rely on, and that the supporting cast he provides the foundation he was afforded is not good enough to step up when a key player is playing hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Wow, didn't catch that!  I don't think Chuba's a power back either but he's usually good at getting that 1 or 2 yards. That was an uncharacteristic day for him.
    • The referee assigned to this game is Shawn Smith. This is a critical data point for betting purposes because his crew has one of the most distinct, long-term statistical biases in the NFL. "Road Team" Bias: Historically, Shawn Smith is known as the "Road Team Referee." In a league where home teams usually win ~55% of the time, home teams in Smith's games have historically won at a rate far below league average (often hovering around 40-42%). Against The Spread (ATS): The trend is even starker here. Home teams have covered the spread at a rate of roughly 37-40% in his career. The Mechanism: Analysis shows his crew tends to call a higher rate of False Start and Unnecessary Roughness penalties on the Home Team. This negates the traditional home-field advantage (crowd noise causing false starts for the visitors). Impact on This Game: This specific assignment heavily favors the Buccaneers (Road Team). If you believe the referee influences the game, Smith's presence suggests the Panthers will struggle to get "home cooking" calls and may face untimely procedural flags that stall drives. The Panthers have only had Shawn Smith officiate four home games since he became a head referee in 2018, and they are all losses. Date Opponent Result Score Nov 24, 2024 vs. Kansas City Chiefs Loss 27–30 Oct 9, 2022 vs. San Francisco 49ers Loss 15–37 Dec 12, 2021 vs. Atlanta Falcons Loss 21–29 Nov 25, 2018 vs. Seattle Seahawks Loss 27–30   Considering the how rare it is for Shawn Smith to officiate a Panthers game at all, this seems like an odd time to assign him to a Panthers game, unless the NFL wants to kill the Panthers season once and for all.  The Panthers' offensive line situation creates a "perfect storm" for referee Shawn Smith's specific tendency to call False Starts on the home team. The "Carousel" Factor (Communication Vulnerability) The most damning stat for the Panthers' offensive line in 2025 is their lack of continuity. The Stat: By Week 13, the Panthers had already fielded their 10th different offensive line combination. The Impact: False starts are often "communication penalties"—they happen when a guard doesn't hear the center's snap count or a tackle anticipates the wrong cadence. A unit that hasn't played together struggles with non-verbal communication. The Shawn Smith Multiplier: Shawn Smith’s crew calls False Starts at a high rate on home teams. He will likely look for flinches on the exterior of the line. A disjointed line that is constantly rotating players (due to the injuries of starters like Cade Mays and the illness issues with Robert Hunt earlier this season) is "fresh meat" for this specific referee bias. The Specific Culprits (2025 Penalties) Ikem Ekwonu (LT): Leads the team with 4 False Start penalties this season. He is the most frequent violator on the line. Taylor Moton (RT): Has been flagged for 3 False Starts. The Trap: Smith’s crew often focuses on the tackles (the players furthest from the ball) jumping early to get an edge on speed rushers. Since Ekwonu struggles with this discipline naturally, having a referee who hunts for it is a massive disadvantage. The "Managed Outcome" Synthesis The "Bucs Cover" Script: If the desired outcome is a Buccaneers win to solidify their playoff standing, the officials simply have to apply the letter of the law. Calling strict False Starts on a confused, banged-up Panthers O-line will consistently put them in "3rd and Long" situations, killing their drives and allowing the Bucs (-3.5) to cover easily. The "Close Game" Script: If the desired outcome is "Week 18 Drama" (keeping the division tied), look for the officials to ignore the Panthers' twitchy tackles. If Ekwonu jumps a split-second early and no flag is thrown, it effectively neutralizes the Bucs' pass rush, allowing the Panthers to keep the score close. Summary of the Edge Vulnerability: Extreme. The Panthers are playing backup interior linemen (like Jake Curhan or practice squad call-ups) next to jumpy tackles. Betting Implication: This strongly reinforces the Bucs -3 or -3.5 play. The combination of a "Road Team Referee" and a "Home Team O-Line in chaos" suggests the Panthers will beat themselves with procedural penalties. Based on the collision of the hard data (Referee bias + Offensive Line injuries) and the soft narratives ("Managed Outcomes"), here is the definitive recommendation. If you have to place a single Moneyline bet to win this game straight up: The Pick: Tampa Bay Buccaneers (-165) While the "Entertainment Script" hints at a Panthers upset to keep the division messy, the structural disadvantage the Panthers face in this specific matchup is too massive to ignore. Here is why the Buccaneers are the stong moneyline play: 1. The "Shawn Smith" Road-Field Advantage This is the decisive factor. In the NFL, Home Field Advantage usually accounts for about 1.5 to 2 points of value. The Reality: Referee Shawn Smith negates that advantage entirely. His crew calls penalties in a way that historically suppresses home crowd momentum (False Starts, holding). The Result: You are essentially getting the Buccaneers on a neutral field (or even a "pseudo-home" field) against a team with a worse roster. 2. The "Drive-Killer" Synergy To win as an underdog, the Panthers need to play a clean, mistake-free game to keep drives alive. The combination of Panthers' 10th O-Line combo + Jump-prone Tackles (Ekwonu) + A Referee who hunts False Starts is a recipe for disaster. The Scenario: Expect the Panthers to face multiple "1st and 15" or "3rd and 12" situations due to procedural flags. These drive-killers will force them to punt or settle for field goals, while the Bucs' offense (led by Mayfield) stays on schedule. 3. The "TV Product" Counter-Argument You asked about the "Managed Outcome." While a Panthers win creates "chaos," the NFL also values Star Power in the playoffs. Baker Mayfield and the Buccaneers are a proven national TV draw with recent playoff history. If the league has to choose between "Chaos" (Panthers) and "Ratings/Legitimacy" (Bucs), the "Script" likely leans toward ensuring the Buccaneers—the more marketable team—secure the division lead. They won't "fix" the game against the Panthers, but they won't intervene to save them from their own penalties. Final Verdict Betting on the Panthers requires you to hope for a miracle 4th-quarter collapse. Betting on the Buccaneers requires you to trust that a superior roster—aided by a favorable officiating crew—will control the game for the first 45 minutes. Take the Buccaneers Moneyline. The "Safe" money is on the Ref. The Prediction: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Win and Cover Projected Score: Buccaneers 27, Panthers 17 The Bet: Buccaneers -3 (or Moneyline -165) Confidence Level: High on the Winner; Moderate on the Spread (due to potential "garbage time" variance).
×
×
  • Create New...