Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will we scale back to 3 TE's this year?


panther4life

Recommended Posts

We have at least opened the season, if not carried 4 TE's throughout the year, every year since Rivera got here.

2011: Olsen, Shockey, Brockel, Hartstock

2012: Olsen, Barnidge, Brockel, Harstock

2013. Olsen,Brockel, Harstock, Brandon Williams

2014. Olsen,Dickson, Brockel, Williams

2015. Olsen, Dickson, Brockel, Williams.

2 of the 4 that have been on the roster the past 3 years (Brockel and Williams) are already gone and Dickson has pretty much assumed the role previously filled by Shockey/Barnidge. 

I could be wrong, but I don't believe we have ever had more than 3 active on game day. I don't personally have a preference as to where we add the extra spot if we do scale down but I just feel like that 4th spot could be better allocated else where.

 

For further reference here's what we have averaged since Gman (2013) arrived at all spots.

QB - 3 (In 13 it was only 2 and we used extra spot for DB's)

HB/FB - 4 (4 in 13,14, 5 last year)

WR - 5

TE - 4 

OL - 10 (10 in 13 and 14. 9 last year)

D-lineman - 9 (5 DE's,4DT'S in 13,14, and 5 DT's, 4 DE's last year)

LB - 6

DB's - 9 (In 2013 we kept 10 here and only had 2 QB's)

Specialist - 3

So in previous years, when we went lighter at 1 position we allocated the extra spot to

DB's once (2013)

RB/FB once (2015)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B-Will got axed pretty early in favor of Bersin last year too.

I could see us having four dedicated TEs this year. 

Has anyone ever paid attention on whether or not Simonson, Sandland  and Mucas play on ST, and how they actually looked doing it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep coming up with 54 when I try to narrow things down. Some sources have us keeping 5 DTs or Safeties but I can hardly see the numbers working with only 4 of each. I keep coming back to the offense.

3rd QB
5th RB
6th WR
4th TE

One probably has to go, Webb is likely safe and latest reports have Wegher hanging on. Last year they initially went the 5WR/4TE route, but it didn't take long to switch to 6WR/3TE.

Sent from my SM-N920V using CarolinaHuddle mobile app


Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, O-Ther said:

Brockel was considered more of a FB than TE hybrid. I remember him lining up in the backfield and very rarely on the line of scrimmage. His number, 47, is added evidence of this. The 40's are for FBs, RBs, and LBs

That's a good point. So since we don't have a player with his skill set this year maybe we truly will get down to 3 players listed as  TE's this year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...