Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Worley or McClain?


Kuech the Sneak

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, CRA said:

Worley week 1 IMO has potential for one of the worst levels of it....based on what he showed this preseason and the stage/pressure of this one particular game.  McClain's level is just your run of the mill type.  The "golly, he sucks, sure wish we had better" type.  Not the break your TV because one guy literally is costing a team from running their gameplan

I agree with everything you stated.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does not matter. They both will be abused. The fact that we even need to ask this question defines a huge problem.

I would start Shaq at CB over everyone the Panthers have. That is how bad it is when they take the field on game days.

Let's hope the LBs can bail that secondary out consistently.

This is what happens when the front office fails to address a much needed position for a team that needs to win the SB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

Does not matter. They both will be abused. The fact that we even need to ask this question defines a huge problem.

I would start Shaq at CB over everyone the Panthers have. That is how bad it is when they take the field on game days.

Let's hope the LBs can bail that secondary out consistently.

This is what happens when the front office fails to address a much needed position for a team that needs to win the SB.

No one and I mean no one knows less football than you.

To say every time they step on the field it is a disaster is a joke. Robert McClain started the Super Bowl and contributed holding Denver to 141 passing yards and 0 TDs on the biggest stage possible.

Darryl Worley has never played a meaningful snap in his career. So unless you can tell the future you once again are wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, shaqattaq said:

Is Bene back at 100%? I'm not sure if they were limiting his snaps during preseason because he was still on the mend, or if they were trying to get the rookies all the touches they could. If they're not trying to ease him back into the game, he is a better option outside than either McClain or Worley IMO, so he should start opposite Bradberry.

To answer the question: Between McClain and Worley, let's start Worley. Might as well go balls to the wall.

I agree with this.  And we shouldn't forget that we will be going up against a rookie qb.  Could be that the inexperience at cb and qb offset to the point that they don't really hurt us and might even be able to make a play or two. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, NJPanthers12 said:

No one and I mean no one knows less football than you.

To say every time they step on the field it is a disaster is a joke. Robert McClain started the Super Bowl and contributed holding Denver to 141 passing yards and 0 TDs on the biggest stage possible.

Darryl Worley has never played a meaningful snap in his career. So unless you can tell the future you once again are wrong.

Don't let him get to you. We could win the next 4 Super Bowls in a row and he'd still be griping about Gettledouche. 

The rest of us know what we have in Ol' NipShorts, and are very thankful to have competency in the FO for once. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...