Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jared Goff to be inactive for Rams' season opener


Kevin Greene

Recommended Posts

Panther related because we play them 11-6.

The LA Rams announced Goff won't see the Field week 1 under any circumstances.

"When the Rams open their season against the 49ers on Monday Night Football, No. 1 overall pick Jared Goff will be in street clothes and a punter will be the team's emergency third-string backup.

That's the latest from NFL Network's Steve Wyche, who spoke with Rams coach Jeff Fisher on Tuesday. Fisher told Wyche that Sean Mannion will be the team's backup and punter Johnny Hekkerwill be the emergency backup."

Here's a player the Rams gave a King's ransom for ( Tennessee gets: Rams' first-round pick (2016), two second-round picks (2016), a third-round pick (2016), a first-round pick (2017) and another third-round pick (2017).)

How can Fisher and the Rams so completely disrespect this kid? Seems to me Jeff Fisher is about 10 years past his prime.

Opinions?

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000652822/article/la-rams-trade-up-to-acquire-no-1-pick-from-titans

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always assumed that Fisher and that GM would get tossed out with the rest of the garbage on the way out of STL.  I was shocked when they extended them. Now, they've taken a QB #1 overall who's best asset was that he was the most "NFL ready" QB in the draft. I think most everyone believes Wentz has a higher upside, but probably isn't as ready to see the field right out of the gate. Now, Goff isn't even going to dress while Wentz who missed a chunk of camp and preseason due to injury is going to be a day one starter. 

LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never thought Goff would be good and still am unsure but this to me means nothing about him. I personally do think that QB's should come into the league and sit for a year or even two or three before becoming a starter. I think that development and years of mental reps is extremely important. I don't think it necessarily hurts development to play them early but I do think they should have some redshirt time. Kind of like Rodgers did. Of course not every team has a situation like that where they have a starter like Favre. Fisher did pretty well with McNair with the Titans. He was drafted in the top 5 and didn't play for the first 2 years I think before becoming starter and eased his way into it. Of course that long is not ideal for what they gave up to get Goff. That being said, I'd never give up what they gave for any player, even a QB like Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For years many Huddlers said don't draft a top QB while the previous regime was here because there was no way we could develop him. Is this the Rams today? Obviously they felt pressure to make a big splash coming back to Los Angeles and made the move for Goff.

Also, can you imagine Cam sitting for 2 or 3 years and how that would have retarded the QB he is today?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, thebigcat said:


Him and John Fox are prime examples of coaches that rest on their laurels. Had a few good seasons early on and have been coasting on mediocre mood since


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

I wouldn't lump John Fox in there with him at all. Fox has made a career out of turning around wrecked franchises, and you could say that Kubiak rode Fox's team to the Super Bowl last year and you wouldn't be far from the truth. Fox's style of team building and player development were all over that... except that he had a QB that he didn't have to try to develop.

He inherited a 4-12 2010 Broncos team and brought them to 8-8 in his first year. Follow that up with 13, 13, and 12 wins, plus a Super Bowl appearance and that wasn't too bad. Manning did come in at that time, but he wasn't the only one as the defense and running back by committee idea were really built up. He did for Denver what he did for Carolina in the first part of his tenure here.

I think Elway made him fall on his sword after the embarassing Super Bowl loss.

Now, Fox is in Chicago and the mess there is worse than any place he's been before. Mainly, it's because he has been saddled with Cutler -- a QB just good enough to hold onto a starting spot for a bad team, and just bad enough to keep that team bad. If Fox survives QB-killer Cutler, then I'll be amazed.

Fisher... he's been brought in to fix mediocre teams and generally ran them into the ground or just managed to polish the turds that they were into basically, slightly shinier turds.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...