Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let's not beat around the bush here


LinvilleGorge

Recommended Posts

Screenshot_2016-09-09-00-12-48_zpso4l5l7

We won in every meaningful statistical category. We had more rushing yards, more passing yards, we won the time of possession, and a higher red zone conversion percentage. Not listed here was also a higher 3rd down percentage conversion (9-15 vs. 5-10).

What's the one stat line that really stands put as significantly different? 8-85 vs. 4-22. That was the key difference, folks. 

You need some major fugery for a team to lose on the scoreboard when they win on yardage, time of possession, and turnover battle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like i said in another thread, a team like Denver who only has defense needs the whistles to go their way. They need the refs to not see the holding, illegal contact, and flagrant hits in order to stay in the game. If those calls are made, all that adds up insane penalty yardage not even there defense came overcome against a good all around team. We got beat again by the zebras not Denver. 2 games back to back same play out? Cant make this poo up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

to be honest, winning in every statistical category and losing on the scoreboard happens all the time in the NFL. 

 

I wish I had ESPN's fancy computer that spits out random stats, but I'd be willing to bet good money that a team that 1. gains more yards 2. wins time of possession 3. wins the turnover battle 4. has a higher redzone percentage and 5. has a higher 3rd down conversion percentage likely has a staggeringly high winning percentage. Like probably damn near never loses. I'm talking Stephen Curry free throw percentage type win percentage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Like i said in another thread, a team like Denver who only has defense needs the whistles to go their way. They need the refs to not see the holding, illegal contact, and flagrant hits in order to stay in the game. If those calls are made, all that adds up insane penalty yardage not even there defense came overcome against a good all around team. We got beat again by the zebras not Denver. 2 games back to back same play out? Cant make this poo up.

Denver has STILL YET to fairly beat us. Superbowl was rigged, this game was rigged, and I'm willing to bet any other future games against Denver will be rigged in their favor. Nothing anybody says will convince me that we are a worse team than them. Play us without the refs and we win 9 times out of 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

ok, maybe in those specific statistical categories teams do win more often than not. I'm just saying stats don't always tell the full story. The outcome of games are determined by many different factors. In this case, Gano makes that kick and all the stats you mentioned are indicative of the outcome of the game. 

I see what you're saying, but we lost by 1 point. If we would have gotten blown out on the scoreboard but won in every statistical category, then I would say you're on to something

It's not just that we gained more yards than they did or something like that. 

You can pick just about any single statistical category and it's relatively insignificant by itself (except turnovers, that on by itself is significant -  I can't find the NFL stats, but in college football a team that's +2 in turnovers for a game like we were tonight wins over 80% of the time) , but when you have a near clean sweep on the stat sheet, it's HARD to lose. Something weird had to happen. Special teams scores, defensive scores, etc. None of that happened. What happened is pretty clear on that boxscore. Ref fugery happened. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...