Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What was the largest issue today?


The Question

Recommended Posts

First off, no I don't think the sky is falling and I don't think these issues are unsolvable within the next couple weeks but after being a fan for 14+ years this is one of the more disappointing losses I can remember. Maybe it's due to my expectations but overall I'd like for you all to choose one and maybe elaborate because I'm dumbfounded...

- Offensive Line play

-Cam Holding the ball too long

- Offensive play selection (no slants, no toss ups to kelvin, too many screens, etc)

-Receivers not getting separation

- Cam overthrowing on the long balls

- Bad coverage in the second half, leaving tight ends way too open between zones)

- Lack of pressure from the ends

- Stewart being out (Although I don't think we win this game with him healthy)

- Penalty calls (whether correct or not) or lack their of for the Vikings)

-ZERO half time adjustment after a lack luster but not horrible production on offense in the first half

Was it just a bad day? What the hell is going on here guys?

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, morgan55 said:

Charlotte.

I must say, that the first possession of the 2nd half has always been awful but today even the announcers commented on how empty the joint was and how little energy was in the building as they marched down the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...