Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"But, Jersh gave up 178 yerds in Atlanter last seezun"


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

A refresher on why Josh rose to prominence on the national scene and got himself into the "best corner" conversation.  Oh, how quickly some of you conveniently forget to fit things into your own narrative...  His career started in 2012.  He became a permanent starter in 2014.  These are Julio's career stats against us while Josh has been in the league.

Julio Jones Career Game Log vs. Panthers   Pro Football Reference.com.png

 

So, to put things into correct perspective for those of you in denial...  Over 4 games in Josh's two years as a full-time starter, and just to entertain you we'll say all 178 yards were attributed to Josh in last season's matchup (even though they weren't), Julio racked up a whopping 383 yards total.  

So, 383 yards over four games spanning two years.

vs.

300 yards in one game on one day.

But, pass rush, amirite?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, fieryprophet said:

Norman wouldn't have changed much today. We have no pass rush. Our scheme depends on pass rush. We have none. We would be boned with Norman too.

I like you but this is the dumbest thing you've ever said bar none. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Kevin Greene said:

But it would have been different if we had Norman!11!1!!11!1!1!1

building-science-geek-energy-nerd-home-p

Fugging Gettleman!!!!11!!1!111!1

tumblr_mjba7hh4Vs1r2731oo1_500.png

 

given that you've already demonstrated difficulty with the basic mathematics affiliated with the conversation I'm really not sure this is a good battle to fight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...