Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did anyone notice the playclock...


Darth Biscuit

Recommended Posts

Didn't ever get below 5 seconds last night with Anderson out there?

 

We've had consistent issues with running out of play time, particularly early this season.  We're often snapping it with 1 or 2 seconds left on it.

I'm a huge Cam fan, but something like that is noticeable and not attributable to much else that I can think of...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Krovvy said:

We ran a lot of hurry up last night. When Cam runs hurry up the offense works like clockwork as well.

They didn't run hurry up all game tho... there was a distinct difference last night... they had plenty of time.  The team was lined up with 12-15 seconds left on the play clock consistently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Darth Biscuit said:

They didn't run hurry up all game tho... there was a distinct difference last night... they had plenty of time.  The team was lined up with 12-15 seconds left on the play clock consistently.

Look into the Chud years. If you find us running out the clock like we are now then maybe I'll agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Darth Biscuit said:

They didn't run hurry up all game tho... there was a distinct difference last night... they had plenty of time.  The team was lined up with 12-15 seconds left on the play clock consistently.

Could be more basic plays?  I mean I'm sure it's not because Cam is talking slower. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam spends more time in the huddle getting these complicated plays. Cam has been visibly frustrated and yelling at them for not getting the plays in and wasting TO. Remember the Seattle game last year when he ended up having to waste a TO and was mad saying he's not getting the play in. DA didn't have to do that. Example in game planning for different QBs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing to keep in mind is that Anderson may have less plays to choose from and/or less things to decipher before he snaps the ball due to the fact Cam (if it is an option) probably has to take a closer look at the defensive front.

I'm just spit balling though.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Snake said:

Could be more basic plays?  I mean I'm sure it's not because Cam is talking slower. 

With Cam there's a lot more combinations of things you can run, with Derek it's pretty straight forward. Makes sense that the play call would be in quicker 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

aside from the 3 absolute boneheaded plays, DA actually had a good game. He was hitting receivers in stride, the timing was impeccable at times, and his pocket awareness was good for the most part. 

we should be talking about a Panthers win. unfortunately we're not. 

And we're not because of DA. You're basically saying outside of losing the game DA played well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that’s where a lot of people struggle to see it with Bryce Bryce is never physically going to “wow” anyone. Which will ultimately keep him out of that elite QB tier.  Burrow, Mahomes, Allen, Lamar, Maye, Stafford People want to put Herbert in that tier because he’s the ultimate highlight type QB. Highlights in this day and age trump just about everything. I’m more inclined to put Dak in that category than Herbert.  Then there’s the tier before the elite group. That’s where I believe Young’s ceiling is. Which is fine. You better have a good team and a good coach around these types though.  I believe Bryce has a higher ceiling than Goff. Put Young on Detroit and that team has a higher ceiling. Would also have a lower floor but you’d take that.  Bryce doesn’t have many true ‘wtf’ moments. He definitely did his rookie year. Granted the bulk of his “supporting cast” and HC are out of the league now and were well on their way out when the arrived here.  Due to lack of physical traits and what made Bryce good at Bama this NFL thing was and still is going to take time with him. He’s adjusting to NFL defenses.  So sure, we’re kind of in a pickle. Do we keep Bryce and have something like the 10th best QB in the league paired with Canales whose ceiling is probably similar at his position or do we keep doing what we’ve been doing since 2017? This team has been an absolute mess since Tepper took over. He’s finally seeing some wins. I’m all for spending a day 3 pick every year on a QB with traits. But for the time being Young is definitely our best option in 2026 and it would be tough to imagine us having a better option at this point in 2027 as well I know how much the huddle loves charts but this wasn’t happening his rookie year. This chart is 2 weeks old but point remains. It’s also why I said Dalton would be useless against Buffalo. Bryce has done a real good job at avoiding sacks this year and then making something happen. Bryce is fully capable of giving you those 4-5 big plays you need from a QB a game. Those 4-5 big plays just look a lot different than the 4-5 big highlight type plays you get from those physically gifted QB’s
    • 5 games without a turnover, the defense has surprised me a lot this year. Second to last in sacks, yet still getting the job done, impressive. 
    • Dave “Uncanny” Canales His choices are often inexplicable, but work absurdly well about half the time.
×
×
  • Create New...