Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NBC blasts NFL for Rams going to Cam's head


CPantherKing

Recommended Posts

Dungy and Harrison made it known nationally that the Rams went to Cam's head with forcible hits and the officials failed to call unnecessary roughness.

They once again made it known the NFL needs to do something about it.

It happened twice with the Barron hit and the Donald hit. Both defenders left their feet. Both players should receive fines this week.

Barron hit. NBCs angle showed it definitively.

 

 

 

 

 

The NFL must make them pay and rack up 2 more missed calls. This has to stop. They could go for the body, but they launch for the head. Cam Newton is 6'5". It takes effort to hit him in the head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to mention, Dungy, Harrison and Faulk calling the NFL out will do nothing. Cam has called them out and it did nothing. Sure Ron said they've talked to Goodell about these hits, but call them out publicly on it. Make this a deal until it's resolved. Don't sit back, fold your arms and go on the good word. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may disagree completely with your views on Gettleman, but when it comes to hits and the poor referees, there's no doubt that it's atrocious.

Those two big sacks were BOTH helmet to helmets. You'd have to be blind to not notice it. I was completely shocked to see the Fox crew completely treat it like nothing.

Something needs to happen. And not a pat on the back and "it'll be okay"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...