Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers are best in kick return coverage and second worst in punt return coverage


Recommended Posts

I like looking through league stats on ESPN from time to time and just saw that we have the best opponent kick return average in the league of 16.6 yards/return, but we have the second worst opponent punt return average of 13.2 yards/return. Maybe the kick return average is inflated by opponents attempting to return Gano's kickoffs deep in their own endzone, but this seems strange considering a lot of the same guys play kicks and punts right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

We honestly haven't had good special teams coaching at any point under Rivera.

DeHaven is a good coach but I think asking him to coach while he was battling cancer was too much.

I really don't feel we practice ST all that much either. It's why we have a sloppy unit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

We honestly haven't had good special teams coaching at any point under Rivera.

DeHaven is a good coach but I think asking him to coach while he was battling cancer was too much.

I've been a fan since 2003 and I think the only two good things I remember about Panthers special teams are Kasay and Smitty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, outlaw4 said:

I've been a fan since 2003 and I think the only two good things I remember about Panthers special teams are Kasay and Smitty.

Yea those come to mind. Michael Bates from the late 90's was a bad ass too. Not a great receiver that I remember but would probably give Ginn a run for his money in the 100 yard dash . 

On a different note, just from the eye test I'm not sure why teams don't just take a knee. Starting from the 25 seems like a better average starting position than most of the returns I've seen watching football this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, arbnranger said:

Yea those come to mind. Michael Bates from the late 90's was a bad ass too. Not a great receiver that I remember but would probably give Ginn a run for his money in the 100 yard dash . 

On a different note, just from the eye test I'm not sure why teams don't just take a knee. Starting from the 25 seems like a better average starting position than most of the returns I've seen watching football this year. 

I always enjoyed watching He Hate Me (Rod Smart) too.

The only reason I can think of for running out of the end zone is that, if they're able to break a long runback, it's a tremendous momentum swing in their favor, energizing the team. Of course if they do score, that's another thing too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hard to interpret some of Brugler's opinions. Capable of running a robust route tree sounds like a lazy thing to say - I'm sure just about every slot TE is capable of running a full route tree... I want to know if he is currently able to (which from tape leads me to a no). Granted, it's pretty common for most receivers/TE not having a full route tree developed before they get drafted. Agility/acceleration after the catch hasn't shown up on his tape (at least his Oregon tape) for those dig/out breaking routes while it has for the seam and slant routes. Agree he has a good physical build and he is very good running seam routes. His build definitely helps him to shield defenders and create a large target point for the QB. Drops were a concern, but it could be focus drops just like T-Mac was/is prone to. Run blocking is an accurate statement, but again, we have only seen him run block in the slot/backfield - inline blocking is a whole different animal. With his athleticism, he definitely has a high ceiling. I just think he also has a low floor and don't like taking that big of a risk on a mid 1st rounder. I think this is a deep TE draft and would much rather target one in the 3rd or later. He's very boom or bust to me - bust in terms of being worth a 1st round pick, not an out of the NFL in a few years type bust. I feel like he gives me Evan Engram vibes. Not saying that Evan Engram was/is a bad NFL player, just that most people would agree he shouldn't have been drafted in the 1st.
    • I mean I would love 6-1. It’s funny the hurricanes usually dominate the first game and win by three or four goals. But keep the second game close. It would be nice if it’s the reverse of that tonight.
    • Brugler has him as TE1 and going to the Ravens in the first.  Apparently Sadiq's football IQ is pretty high (interviewed very well).  Also he was an WR and CB in high school.  This is why I always thought his route running was solid.  I'm sure it needs some polishing but for a TE it's pretty good. nfl.com Built like a bodyguard with a compact, well-defined frame. Capable of running a robust route tree. Gets in and out of breaks with good snap and separation. Vandalizes defensive seams with impunity against man coverage. Survives collisions with catches thanks to his hand strength. Shows off agility and acceleration after the catch. Fits up run blocks with proper positioning and base width. Grips and presses forward with moving feet to stay connected. -Again I don't know if we should take him but if he goes to the right team he could become a scary weapon at the next level.  I just like him as a prospect.
×
×
  • Create New...