Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rob Chudzinski


Jangler

Chud for Coach 2017?  

85 members have voted

  1. 1. Chud for Coach?

    • Yes
      10
    • Sure/wtf?
      8
    • No
      59
    • merkins are stupid
      8


Recommended Posts

I actually liked his play calling the other night.  Really, nothing like he did here.  I don't think we'd become the Browns though.  He's not the reason they're a dud franchise.  That being said, I don't think I'd be too interested in him for HC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a head coach? Um, no.

I would be open to OC due to his familiarity though. People don't realize that when we do show Shula the door, there is going to be an inevitable adjustment period with a new OC, and after a season like this, fan patience is going to be very low. Limiting that adjustment period as much as possible should be priority.

But right now, playcalling changes won't make up for our WR's not getting open or flat out dropping passes. Need improvement all around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, TheRed said:

As a head coach? Um, no.

I would be open to OC due to his familiarity though. People don't realize that when we do show Shula the door, there is going to be an inevitable adjustment period with a new OC, and after a season like this, fan patience is going to be very low. Limiting that adjustment period as much as possible should be priority.

But right now, playcalling changes won't make up for our WR's not getting open or flat out dropping passes. Need improvement all around.

I pied you for the realization that if we change OCs it could take a year or two for the offense to recover. I am not in favor of Chud. From what I remember he was not a big fan of Cam's and gave him little control over the offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We’re in a pickle. My best hope is we protect him and can run the ball vs most Ds and the WRs are healthy so he has every chance to not look like what he looked like in too many games last year.   
    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
×
×
  • Create New...